RQI vs. RLTY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RQI (Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund) and RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 3 years, RQI returned 14.02%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for RLTY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

RQI vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 18.94% return, which is significantly higher than RLTY's 9.23% return.

RQI

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -1.58%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 6M: 17.22%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 4.51%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

RLTY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 9.23%
• 6M: 7.62%
• 1Y: 12.14%
• 3Y*: 15.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQI vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	18.94%	2.07%	8.04%	15.74%	-18.92%
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	9.23%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RQI and RLTY is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.77
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.77
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.73

The correlation between RQI and RLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RQI vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQI

RQI Risk / Return Rank: 67
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 64
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 60
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQI vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RQI	RLTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	0.93	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.49	1.40	+0.09
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.17	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	1.05	+0.27
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.94	3.50	+0.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RQI vs. RLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is comparable to the RLTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and RLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RQI	RLTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	0.93	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.13	+0.15

Drawdowns

RQI vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and RLTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	RQI	RLTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.59%	-35.44%	-56.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.74%	-11.40%	-0.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.43%	-20.81%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.02%	-2.27%	+0.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.93%	-13.77%	-4.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.94%	3.42%	+0.52%

Volatility

RQI vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 3.85%. This indicates that RQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RQI	RLTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	3.85%	+0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.67%	10.09%	+1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.90%	13.10%	+1.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.96%	22.76%	+0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.94%	22.76%	+4.18%

Dividends

RQI vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.70%, more than RLTY's 8.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	8.52%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund	8.70%	9.54%	7.84%	7.84%	10.41%	5.27%	7.74%	6.79%	9.27%	7.59%	7.86%	7.86%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RQI and RLTY in my portfolio?

RQI and RLTY have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RQI or RLTY?

RQI has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to RLTY (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQI dropped -91.59% vs RLTY's -35.44%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.