PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQI vs. RLTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RQI vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 15.75% return, which is significantly higher than RLTY's 13.69% return.


RQI

1D
0.08%
1M
1.37%
6M
7.35%
YTD
15.75%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
10.38%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
7.19%
ALL TIME*
9.23%

RLTY

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.75%
6M
10.52%
YTD
13.69%
1Y
13.10%
3Y*
12.56%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$847.93K$984.15K$858.81K
$7.82M$10.96M$9.22M

RQI vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc.
15.75%2.07%8.04%15.74%-15.28%
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
13.69%8.56%15.40%14.05%-28.45%

Correlation

The correlation between RQI and RLTY is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.72

The correlation between RQI and RLTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RQI:

$1.69B

RLTY:

$265.89M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQI vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

RLTY
RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RQI vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RQIRLTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.69

3.93

-1.24

RQI vs. RLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the RLTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and RLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RQI vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and RLTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQIRLTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-35.44%

-56.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-11.40%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-20.81%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.71%

-1.91%

-3.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-13.28%

-4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.70%

3.42%

+1.28%

Volatility

RQI vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. (RQI) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 3.27%. This indicates that RQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQIRLTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.27%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

10.45%

+2.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

13.08%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.98%

22.45%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.93%

22.45%

+4.48%

Dividends

RQI vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.22%, more than RLTY's 8.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.30%8.98%8.93%9.18%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc.
9.22%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%

Financials

RQI vs. RLTY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund, Inc. and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RQI and RLTY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQI has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to RLTY (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQI dropped -91.59% vs RLTY's -35.44%.

RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.03 vs 0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQI and RLTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer