RQI vs. RLTY

In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 3.58% return, which is significantly lower than RLTY's 6.37% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is comparable to the RLTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and RLTY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, less than RLTY's 8.71% yield.

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.64%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and RLTY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a higher volatility of 5.12% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) at 4.75%. This indicates that RQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.