PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RQI vs. HQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RQI vs. HQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly lower than HQH's 15.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RQI has underperformed HQH with an annualized return of 7.83%, while HQH has yielded a comparatively higher 8.60% annualized return.


RQI

1D
0.49%
1M
-6.65%
YTD
12.82%
6M
13.49%
1Y
8.43%
3Y*
12.66%
5Y*
3.69%
10Y*
7.83%

HQH

1D
1.29%
1M
5.19%
YTD
15.08%
6M
13.64%
1Y
53.16%
3Y*
19.40%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*
8.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQI vs. HQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
12.82%2.07%8.04%15.74%-31.07%56.64%-9.28%54.62%-11.11%11.73%
HQH
Tekla Healthcare Investors
15.08%34.12%10.22%1.22%-17.27%7.99%24.82%26.80%-13.08%15.97%

Correlation

The correlation between RQI and HQH is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2002

0.40

The correlation between RQI and HQH shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

RQI:

$1.09

HQH:

$6.05

PE Ratio

RQI:

11.38

HQH:

3.38

PS Ratio

RQI:

4.61

HQH:

34.56

Total Revenue (TTM)

RQI:

$360.06M

HQH:

$32.46M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RQI:

$283.39M

HQH:

$27.34M

EBITDA (TTM)

RQI:

$130.74M

HQH:

$173.45M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RQI vs. HQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQI
RQI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
RQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HQH
HQH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
HQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HQH Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
HQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HQH Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQI vs. HQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RQIHQHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.41

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.72

4.11

-3.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.04

14.32

-12.28

RQI vs. HQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQI Sharpe Ratio is 0.54, which is lower than the HQH Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQI and HQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RQI vs. HQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than HQH's maximum drawdown of -62.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and HQH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RQIHQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.59%

-62.36%

-29.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.74%

-13.01%

+1.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.43%

-21.14%

-1.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.06%

-37.55%

-3.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.12%

-37.55%

-21.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.10%

0.00%

-8.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.90%

-21.02%

+3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.13%

3.72%

+0.41%

Volatility

RQI vs. HQH - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Tekla Healthcare Investors (HQH) have volatilities of 6.20% and 5.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RQIHQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

5.96%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.87%

14.82%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

20.49%

-4.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.01%

19.62%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.98%

21.51%

+5.47%

Dividends

RQI vs. HQH - Dividend Comparison

RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, less than HQH's 11.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HQH
Tekla Healthcare Investors
11.33%11.56%14.21%9.66%9.50%8.59%7.97%8.24%10.75%8.78%9.80%11.97%
RQI
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund
9.31%9.54%7.84%7.84%10.41%5.27%7.74%6.79%9.27%7.59%7.86%7.86%

Financials

RQI vs. HQH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund and Tekla Healthcare Investors. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20212022202320242025
55.28M
17.03M
(RQI) Total Revenue
(HQH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RQI and HQH have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RQI has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to HQH (5.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RQI dropped -91.59% vs HQH's -62.36%.

HQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RQI and HQH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer