RQI vs. EFT
Compare and contrast key facts about Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT).
Performance
RQI vs. EFT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RQI vs. EFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund | 9.09% | 2.07% | 8.04% | 15.74% | -31.07% | 56.64% | -9.28% | 54.62% | -11.11% | 11.73% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | -4.39% | -3.77% | 13.17% | 27.14% | -19.69% | 21.00% | 2.41% | 16.85% | -6.14% | 1.63% |
Fundamentals
RQI:
$1.64B
EFT:
$282.79M
RQI:
$1.09
EFT:
$0.85
RQI:
11.23
EFT:
12.53
RQI:
4.55
EFT:
4.70
RQI:
1.01
EFT:
0.85
RQI:
$360.06M
EFT:
$60.18M
RQI:
$283.39M
EFT:
$36.55M
RQI:
$130.74M
EFT:
$24.44M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQI achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly higher than EFT's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, RQI has outperformed EFT with an annualized return of 7.96%, while EFT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.76% annualized return.
RQI
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- -8.04%
- YTD
- 9.09%
- 6M
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.65%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
EFT
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -1.44%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 6M
- -5.13%
- 1Y
- -6.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQI vs. EFT — Risk / Return Rank
RQI
EFT
RQI vs. EFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQI | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.32 | -0.48 | +0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | -0.56 | +1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 0.91 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | -0.56 | +1.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.44 | -1.28 | +2.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQI | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 | -0.48 | +0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.28 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 | 0.37 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.26 | +0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between RQI and EFT is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RQI vs. EFT - Dividend Comparison
RQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.19%, less than EFT's 9.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQI Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund | 9.19% | 9.54% | 7.84% | 7.84% | 10.41% | 5.27% | 7.74% | 6.79% | 9.27% | 7.59% | 7.86% | 7.86% |
EFT Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust | 9.86% | 9.55% | 10.52% | 11.09% | 9.81% | 5.24% | 5.88% | 7.41% | 6.77% | 5.73% | 5.54% | 6.57% |
Drawdowns
RQI vs. EFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQI drawdown since its inception was -91.59%, which is greater than EFT's maximum drawdown of -60.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQI and EFT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQI | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.59% | -60.58% | -31.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.25% | -13.02% | -1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.06% | -24.98% | -16.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.12% | -45.51% | -13.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.04% | -12.88% | +4.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.04% | -8.80% | -9.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 5.69% | -1.20% |
Volatility
RQI vs. EFT - Volatility Comparison
Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund (RQI) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust (EFT) at 5.25%. This indicates that RQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RQI | EFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 5.25% | +0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 6.96% | +4.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.39% | 13.97% | +4.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.06% | 12.67% | +10.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 15.74% | +11.20% |
Financials
RQI vs. EFT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund and Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RQI vs. EFT - Profitability Comparison
RQI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported a gross profit of 43.68M and revenue of 55.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.0%.
EFT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 13.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
RQI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported an operating income of -10.03M and revenue of 55.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.2%.
EFT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported an operating income of 13.37M and revenue of 13.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 95.7%.
RQI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Cohen & Steers Quality Income Realty Fund reported a net income of -27.67M and revenue of 55.28M, resulting in a net margin of -50.1%.
EFT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Trust reported a net income of 7.76M and revenue of 13.97M, resulting in a net margin of 55.6%.