RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE
RQFI.DE (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D) and DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - RQFI.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE returned 5.34%/yr vs 3.94%/yr for DBX9.DE. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RQFI.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DBX9.DE.
Performance
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 10.42% return, which is significantly higher than DBX9.DE's 9.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has outperformed DBX9.DE with an annualized return of 5.34%, while DBX9.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 3.94% annualized return.
RQFI.DE
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- 10.42%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- 1Y
- 34.46%
- 3Y*
- 9.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.34%
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 33.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 10.42% | 11.14% | 22.25% | -16.68% | -21.96% | 7.77% | 24.32% | 37.46% | -24.88% | 16.25% |
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between RQFI.DE and DBX9.DE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2014 | 0.73 |
The correlation between RQFI.DE and DBX9.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.90 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
RQFI.DE
DBX9.DE
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RQFI.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.91 | 1.90 | +4.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.55 | 3.67 | +11.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RQFI.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.24 | +1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.01 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.15 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.08 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, smaller than the maximum DBX9.DE drawdown of -66.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and DBX9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RQFI.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.79% | -66.51% | +14.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.82% | -17.20% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.48% | -27.83% | +0.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.44% | -47.59% | +6.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.24% | -53.98% | +8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.80% | -14.62% | +2.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -29.50% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | 8.91% | -6.70% |
Volatility
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.89% compared to Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) at 5.29%. This indicates that RQFI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBX9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RQFI.DE | DBX9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 5.29% | +0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | 10.45% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.40% | 26.35% | -10.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 28.75% | -7.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 25.42% | -3.60% |
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DBX9.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
RQFI.DE vs. DBX9.DE - Dividend Comparison
RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, while DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D | 1.44% | 1.84% | 1.40% | 1.98% | 1.97% | 0.90% | 1.32% | 0.75% | 2.31% | 2.00% | 1.81% | 0.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RQFI.DE and DBX9.DE have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.
RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for RQFI.DE and 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
Find the right allocation for RQFI.DE and DBX9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer