DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while AH50.DE tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for AH50.DE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AH50.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than AH50.DE's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE has underperformed AH50.DE with an annualized return of 3.94%, while AH50.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- 1Y
- 31.60%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 41.09% | -16.54% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and AH50.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between DBX9.DE and AH50.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
AH50.DE
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 4.40 | -2.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 12.99 | -9.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.83 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.05 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.36 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.35 | -0.27 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than AH50.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and AH50.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -45.20% | -21.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -7.15% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -25.16% | -2.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -38.58% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | -45.20% | -8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -5.93% | -8.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -16.78% | -12.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 2.43% | +6.48% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.29%, while Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AH50.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.94% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 12.32% | -1.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 17.18% | +9.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 23.21% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 22.82% | +2.60% |
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than AH50.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. AH50.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and AH50.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.65% for AH50.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and AH50.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer