DBX9.DE vs. FXI
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and FXI (iShares China Large-Cap ETF) are both China Equities funds - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while FXI tracks the FTSE China 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for FXI. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FXI.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
DBX9.DE is traded in EUR, while FXI is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FXI values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly higher than FXI's -6.31% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE has outperformed FXI with an annualized return of 3.94%, while FXI has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 13.25%
- 1Y
- 32.77%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
FXI
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.31%
- 6M
- -8.54%
- 1Y
- -1.70%
- 3Y*
- 8.74%
- 5Y*
- -2.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.59%
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | -6.31% | 13.65% | 37.49% | -15.04% | -15.74% | -14.08% | -0.06% | 17.50% | -9.21% | 19.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and FXI is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2007 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DBX9.DE and FXI has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. FXI — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
FXI
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.00 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | -0.12 | +2.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | -0.24 | +3.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | -0.09 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | -0.08 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.10 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.04 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, roughly equal to the maximum FXI drawdown of -68.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and FXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -68.86% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -14.78% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -27.97% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -47.51% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | -53.92% | -0.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -24.38% | +9.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -30.14% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 6.97% | +1.94% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.29%, while iShares China Large-Cap ETF (FXI) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | FXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 6.71% | -1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 13.60% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 19.38% | +6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 30.32% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 26.93% | -1.51% |
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than FXI's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. FXI - Dividend Comparison
DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | 2.61% | 2.42% | 1.76% | 3.17% | 2.61% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 2.74% | 2.69% | 2.31% | 2.69% | 2.90% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBX9.DE and FXI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DBX9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DBX9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FXI.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while FXI tracks FTSE China 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.74% for FXI.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and FXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer