PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DBX9.DE is traded in EUR, while ^GSPC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^GSPC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 12.06% return.


DBX9.DE

1D
-0.73%
1M
1.75%
YTD
9.85%
6M
13.25%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
13.37%
5Y*
0.17%
10Y*
3.94%

^GSPC

1D
0.00%
1M
4.16%
YTD
12.06%
6M
10.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
DBX9.DE
Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C
9.85%21.17%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
12.06%10.65%

Correlation

The correlation between DBX9.DE and ^GSPC is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBX9.DE
DBX9.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DBX9.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBX9.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBX9.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DBX9.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBX9.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DBX9.DE^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.67

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DBX9.DE^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

1.98

-1.90

Drawdowns

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBX9.DE^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.51%

-7.57%

-58.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.62%

-0.20%

-14.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.50%

-1.39%

-28.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.91%

Volatility

DBX9.DE vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBX9.DE^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.35%

12.22%

+14.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.75%

12.22%

+16.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.42%

12.22%

+13.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBX9.DE and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer