DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE
DBX9.DE (Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C) and C024.DE (Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist) are both China Equities funds - DBX9.DE tracks the FTSE China 50 while C024.DE tracks the MSCI China A. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE returned 3.94%/yr vs 7.12%/yr for C024.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBX9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for C024.DE.
Performance
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBX9.DE achieves a 9.85% return, which is significantly lower than C024.DE's 12.05% return. Over the past 10 years, DBX9.DE has underperformed C024.DE with an annualized return of 3.94%, while C024.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.12% annualized return.
DBX9.DE
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- 1Y
- 33.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.94%
C024.DE
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 14.60%
- 1Y
- 39.67%
- 3Y*
- 12.08%
- 5Y*
- 0.57%
- 10Y*
- 7.12%
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 9.85% | 10.01% | 37.68% | -16.44% | -13.62% | -14.98% | -0.87% | 18.35% | -9.23% | 18.88% |
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 12.05% | 14.97% | 22.87% | -17.78% | -16.12% | 3.37% | 21.54% | 40.72% | -22.27% | 23.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBX9.DE and C024.DE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2013 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, DBX9.DE and C024.DE have become more correlated (0.92) than their long-term average of 0.69, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE — Risk / Return Rank
DBX9.DE
C024.DE
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) and Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DBX9.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 5.94 | -4.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.67 | 18.19 | -14.52 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DBX9.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 2.60 | -1.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.03 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.30 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.30 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBX9.DE drawdown since its inception was -66.51%, which is greater than C024.DE's maximum drawdown of -49.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBX9.DE and C024.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBX9.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.51% | -49.68% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.20% | -6.78% | -10.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.83% | -25.82% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.59% | -40.46% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.98% | -47.10% | -6.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -8.55% | -6.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.50% | -24.80% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.91% | 2.22% | +6.69% |
Volatility
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C (DBX9.DE) is 5.29%, while Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist (C024.DE) has a volatility of 5.71%. This indicates that DBX9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than C024.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBX9.DE | C024.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.29% | 5.71% | -0.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.45% | 11.25% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.35% | 15.47% | +10.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.75% | 22.92% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.42% | 24.34% | +1.08% |
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBX9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than C024.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBX9.DE vs. C024.DE - Dividend Comparison
DBX9.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while C024.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C024.DE Amundi MSCI China A II UCITS ETF Dist | 1.69% | 1.89% | 2.19% | 1.98% | 1.34% | 1.23% | 1.42% | 1.88% | 2.49% |
DBX9.DE Xtrackers FTSE China 50 UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, DBX9.DE and C024.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, C024.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
C024.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DBX9.DE.
DBX9.DE tracks FTSE China 50, while C024.DE tracks MSCI China A. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DBX9.DE and 0.25% for C024.DE.
Find the right allocation for DBX9.DE and C024.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer