RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE).

RQFI.DE and XCHA.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RQFI.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jan 8, 2014. XCHA.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jun 27, 2012. Both RQFI.DE and XCHA.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	0.32%	11.14%	22.25%	-16.68%	-21.96%	7.77%	24.32%	37.46%	-24.88%	16.25%
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.97%	14.69%	24.35%	-14.26%	-19.18%	13.33%	31.24%	44.98%	-21.84%	18.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than XCHA.DE's 0.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has underperformed XCHA.DE with an annualized return of 4.00%, while XCHA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 7.38% annualized return.

RQFI.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: -1.59%
• 10Y*: 4.00%

XCHA.DE

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: -0.72%
• YTD: 0.97%
• 6M: 3.31%
• 1Y: 21.21%
• 3Y*: 5.75%
• 5Y*: 1.61%
• 10Y*: 7.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XCHA.DE's 0.50% expense ratio.

RQFI.DE

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D

XCHA.DE

Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C

Return for Risk

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQFI.DE

RQFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RQFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RQFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RQFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RQFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

XCHA.DE

XCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
XCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
XCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RQFI.DE	XCHA.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	0.78	+0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	1.32	+0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.24	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	1.54	+2.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	3.07	+5.60
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQFI.DE and XCHA.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RQFI.DE	XCHA.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	0.78	+0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.07	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.31	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.28	0.00

Correlation

The correlation between RQFI.DE and XCHA.DE is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Dividend Comparison

RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	1.58%	1.84%	1.40%	1.98%	1.97%	0.90%	1.32%	0.75%	2.31%	2.00%	1.81%	0.37%
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, roughly equal to the maximum XCHA.DE drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and XCHA.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RQFI.DE	XCHA.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.79%	-52.27%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.78%	-16.43%	+8.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.44%	-37.07%	-4.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.24%	-38.55%	-6.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.86%	-11.86%	-8.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-22.95%	-4.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	8.26%	-5.77%

Volatility

RQFI.DE vs. XCHA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) at 4.47%. This indicates that RQFI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XCHA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RQFI.DE	XCHA.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	4.47%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	23.93%	-12.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.23%	27.14%	-10.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	23.28%	-2.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	23.28%	-1.40%