RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE).

RQFI.DE and CEBG.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RQFI.DE is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. It was launched on Jan 8, 2014. CEBG.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MarketGrader New China ESG. It was launched on Aug 25, 2010. Both RQFI.DE and CEBG.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	0.32%	11.14%	22.25%	-16.68%	-21.96%	7.77%	24.32%	37.46%	-24.88%	16.25%
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A	10.47%	38.75%	-22.52%	33.05%	5.85%	26.86%	-10.03%	15.73%	-10.56%	-0.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RQFI.DE achieves a 0.32% return, which is significantly lower than CEBG.DE's 10.47% return. Over the past 10 years, RQFI.DE has underperformed CEBG.DE with an annualized return of 4.00%, while CEBG.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 6.09% annualized return.

RQFI.DE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.33%
• YTD: 0.32%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: 17.71%
• 3Y*: 3.07%
• 5Y*: -1.59%
• 10Y*: 4.00%

CEBG.DE

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 1.52%
• YTD: 10.47%
• 6M: 20.96%
• 1Y: 45.77%
• 3Y*: 10.93%
• 5Y*: 14.82%
• 10Y*: 6.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RQFI.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than CEBG.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.

RQFI.DE

Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D

CEBG.DE

VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A

Return for Risk

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RQFI.DE

RQFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RQFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RQFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 51
RQFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RQFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

CEBG.DE

CEBG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 89
CEBG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
CEBG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
CEBG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CEBG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CEBG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) and VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RQFI.DE	CEBG.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.04	-0.96
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.52	2.70	-1.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.36	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	3.47	+0.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.67	13.10	-4.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the CEBG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RQFI.DE and CEBG.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RQFI.DE	CEBG.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.09	2.04	-0.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	0.70	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.18	0.25	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.24	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between RQFI.DE and CEBG.DE is 0.30, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Dividend Comparison

RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, while CEBG.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RQFI.DE Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D	1.58%	1.84%	1.40%	1.98%	1.97%	0.90%	1.32%	0.75%	2.31%	2.00%	1.81%	0.37%
CEBG.DE VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RQFI.DE drawdown since its inception was -51.79%, roughly equal to the maximum CEBG.DE drawdown of -53.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RQFI.DE and CEBG.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	RQFI.DE	CEBG.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.79%	-53.49%	+1.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.78%	-12.76%	+4.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.44%	-30.41%	-11.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.24%	-49.60%	+4.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.86%	-3.61%	-16.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-15.17%	-12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.49%	3.12%	-0.63%

Volatility

RQFI.DE vs. CEBG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) is 4.72%, while VanEck New China ESG UCITS ETF A (CEBG.DE) has a volatility of 9.20%. This indicates that RQFI.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEBG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RQFI.DE	CEBG.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	9.20%	-4.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.12%	15.68%	-4.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.23%	22.28%	-6.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.97%	20.86%	+0.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.88%	24.12%	-2.24%