RPG vs. CATH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) and CATH (Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RPG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while CATH is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RPG returned 14.81%/yr vs 14.82%/yr for CATH. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RPG charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for CATH.

Performance

RPG vs. CATH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPG achieves a 31.51% return, which is significantly higher than CATH's 9.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RPG having a 14.81% annualized return and CATH not far ahead at 14.82%.

RPG

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 11.54%
• YTD: 31.51%
• 6M: 32.14%
• 1Y: 41.04%
• 3Y*: 28.39%
• 5Y*: 13.02%
• 10Y*: 14.81%

CATH

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: 4.21%
• YTD: 9.37%
• 6M: 9.22%
• 1Y: 24.47%
• 3Y*: 20.86%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 14.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPG vs. CATH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	31.51%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	28.34%	-4.53%	26.20%
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF	9.37%	17.08%	23.34%	26.15%	-19.96%	28.87%	18.80%	30.64%	-5.80%	22.83%

Correlation

The correlation between RPG and CATH is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2016	0.85

The correlation between RPG and CATH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

RPG vs. CATH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RPG	CATH
Technology	39.6%	38.1%
Industrials	17.6%	7.6%
Consumer Cyclical	17.1%	9.9%
Communication Services	8.8%	10.7%
Healthcare	7.0%	7.9%
Financial Services	5.2%	11.4%
Basic Materials	1.5%	1.7%
Energy	1.4%	3.3%
Utilities	1.1%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.1%	4.6%

Return for Risk

RPG vs. CATH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 65
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 76

CATH

CATH Risk / Return Rank: 58
CATH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CATH Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
CATH Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CATH Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CATH Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPG vs. CATH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) and Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RPG	CATH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	2.03	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.78	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.36	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	2.61	+1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.56	11.67	+2.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RPG vs. CATH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPG Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the CATH Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPG and CATH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RPG	CATH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	2.03	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.56	0.70	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.65	0.80	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	0.79	-0.25

Drawdowns

RPG vs. CATH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPG drawdown since its inception was -53.27%, which is greater than CATH's maximum drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPG and CATH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RPG	CATH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.27%	-33.95%	-19.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.08%	-9.42%	-1.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.75%	-19.34%	-5.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.59%	-28.14%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.58%	-33.95%	-2.63%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.70%	+0.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.84%	-5.20%	-3.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.83%	2.10%	+0.73%

Volatility

RPG vs. CATH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF (CATH) at 2.69%. This indicates that RPG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CATH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RPG	CATH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.43%	2.69%	+3.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.26%	9.11%	+7.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.73%	12.14%	+7.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.44%	17.89%	+5.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.70%	18.61%	+4.09%

RPG vs. CATH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CATH's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

RPG vs. CATH - Dividend Comparison

RPG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than CATH's 0.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CATH Global X S&P 500 Catholic Values ETF	0.77%	0.84%	0.95%	1.16%	1.34%	1.03%	1.23%	0.68%	2.01%	1.27%	0.50%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.17%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RPG and CATH in my portfolio?

RPG and CATH have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RPG or CATH?

RPG has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to CATH (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPG dropped -53.27% vs CATH's -33.95%.

Which ETF is better, RPG or CATH?

On 10-year performance, CATH leads with 14.82% vs 14.81% for RPG. On fees, CATH is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, CATH has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RPG or CATH?

Over the 10-year period, CATH has performed better with a 14.82% return vs 14.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RPG or CATH?

CATH is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for RPG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RPG or CATH?

CATH has the higher dividend yield at 0.77%, compared with 0.17% for RPG.

What is the main difference between RPG and CATH?

RPG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CATH is S&P 500. RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index, while CATH tracks S&P 500 Catholic Values Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for RPG and 0.29% for CATH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.