PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPAR vs. RYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RPAR vs. RYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RPAR vs. RYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
4.45%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
1.10%5.65%10.13%0.27%-13.03%22.13%-0.44%0.14%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 4.45% return, which is significantly higher than RYLD's 1.10% return.


RPAR

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
4.45%
6M
6.49%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*

RYLD

1D
0.40%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
1.10%
6M
5.56%
1Y
12.15%
3Y*
6.22%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RPAR vs. RYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than RYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RPAR vs. RYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

RYLD
RYLD Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
RYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
RYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. RYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPARRYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.37

0.74

+0.63

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.89

1.17

+0.73

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.19

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

0.99

+1.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.13

4.78

+2.35

RPAR vs. RYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is higher than the RYLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and RYLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPARRYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

0.74

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.16

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.26

+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and RYLD is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RPAR vs. RYLD - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than RYLD's 12.09% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.13%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%
RYLD
Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
12.09%12.00%12.03%12.64%13.49%12.35%10.76%6.43%

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. RYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum RYLD drawdown of -41.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and RYLD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RPARRYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

-41.53%

+11.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-12.33%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

-21.33%

-8.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.42%

-3.92%

-1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.83%

-9.04%

-2.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.54%

-0.24%

Volatility

RPAR vs. RYLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 4.61%, while Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) has a volatility of 5.22%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RPARRYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

5.22%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

9.09%

-1.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.74%

16.39%

-4.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.35%

14.20%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.73%

17.38%

-4.65%