RPAR vs. DBEF
RPAR (RPAR Risk Parity ETF) and DBEF (Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF) are both Hedge Fund funds. RPAR is actively managed, while DBEF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RPAR returned 1.76%/yr vs 13.11%/yr for DBEF. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RPAR charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for DBEF.
Performance
RPAR vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 10.25% return.
RPAR
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 7.10%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 9.22%
- 5Y*
- 1.76%
- 10Y*
- —
DBEF
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 4.76%
- YTD
- 10.25%
- 6M
- 12.54%
- 1Y
- 24.51%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 13.11%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
RPAR vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 7.53% | 17.91% | 0.06% | 6.03% | -22.82% | 7.56% | 19.40% | 0.11% |
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 10.25% | 23.16% | 13.40% | 20.15% | -5.13% | 19.60% | 2.03% | 0.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between RPAR and DBEF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019 | 0.45 |
The correlation between RPAR and DBEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RPAR vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RPAR
DBEF
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
RPAR
DBEF
Basic Materials
RPAR
DBEF
Energy
RPAR
DBEF
Healthcare
RPAR
DBEF
Communication Services
RPAR
DBEF
Industrials
RPAR
DBEF
Consumer Defensive
RPAR
DBEF
Utilities
RPAR
DBEF
Technology
RPAR
DBEF
Consumer Cyclical
RPAR
DBEF
Real Estate
RPAR
DBEF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RPAR vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank
RPAR
DBEF
RPAR vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RPAR | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.37 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.63 | 2.62 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 11.01 | -2.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RPAR | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 1.99 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.96 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.55 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
RPAR vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum DBEF drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and DBEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RPAR | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.16% | -32.46% | +2.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -9.41% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.20% | -14.62% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.16% | -14.95% | -15.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.64% | -0.47% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.61% | -4.74% | -6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.44% | 2.23% | +0.21% |
Volatility
RPAR vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 3.56%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RPAR | DBEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.56% | 3.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.37% | 10.14% | -1.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.20% | 12.37% | -2.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.40% | 13.74% | -1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 15.79% | -3.10% |
RPAR vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEF's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
RPAR vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison
RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than DBEF's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBEF Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF | 5.03% | 5.55% | 1.29% | 4.46% | 15.85% | 2.28% | 2.41% | 3.03% | 3.22% | 2.98% | 2.55% | 3.70% |
RPAR RPAR Risk Parity ETF | 2.07% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 3.16% | 4.01% | 2.02% | 0.76% | 0.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RPAR and DBEF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBEF has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs DBEF's -32.46%.
On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 13.11% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.
DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.
They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.36% for DBEF.
RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RPAR and DBEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer