PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RPAR vs. DBEF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RPAR vs. DBEF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RPAR achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than DBEF's 10.25% return.


RPAR

1D
-0.47%
1M
1.78%
YTD
7.53%
6M
7.10%
1Y
21.22%
3Y*
9.22%
5Y*
1.76%
10Y*

DBEF

1D
-0.47%
1M
4.76%
YTD
10.25%
6M
12.54%
1Y
24.51%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
12.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RPAR vs. DBEF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
7.53%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
10.25%23.16%13.40%20.15%-5.13%19.60%2.03%0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between RPAR and DBEF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2019

0.45

The correlation between RPAR and DBEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (5 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RPAR vs. DBEF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RPAR
DBEF

Financial Services

35.9%
24.6%

Basic Materials

6.4%
5.9%

Energy

5.9%
4.1%

Healthcare

5.1%
10.5%

Communication Services

4.9%
4.5%

Industrials

2.1%
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
6.8%

Utilities

0.2%
3.9%

Technology

0.1%
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
7.5%

Real Estate

-0.0%
1.9%

Financial Services

RPAR
35.9%
DBEF
24.6%

Basic Materials

RPAR
6.4%
DBEF
5.9%

Energy

RPAR
5.9%
DBEF
4.1%

Healthcare

RPAR
5.1%
DBEF
10.5%

Communication Services

RPAR
4.9%
DBEF
4.5%

Industrials

RPAR
2.1%
DBEF
19.9%

Consumer Defensive

RPAR
0.3%
DBEF
6.8%

Utilities

RPAR
0.2%
DBEF
3.9%

Technology

RPAR
0.1%
DBEF
10.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RPAR
0.1%
DBEF
7.5%

Real Estate

RPAR
-0.0%
DBEF
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RPAR vs. DBEF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEF
DBEF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DBEF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEF Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEF Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RPAR vs. DBEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RPARDBEFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.62

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.71

11.01

-2.30

RPAR vs. DBEF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RPAR Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the DBEF Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RPAR and DBEF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RPARDBEFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

1.99

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

0.96

-0.82

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.55

-0.19

Drawdowns

RPAR vs. DBEF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RPAR drawdown since its inception was -30.16%, smaller than the maximum DBEF drawdown of -32.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RPAR and DBEF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RPARDBEFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.16%

-32.46%

+2.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.10%

-9.41%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.20%

-14.62%

+1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.16%

-14.95%

-15.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-0.47%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.61%

-4.74%

-6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.23%

+0.21%

Volatility

RPAR vs. DBEF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) is 3.56%, while Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF (DBEF) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that RPAR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RPARDBEFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.99%

-0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.37%

10.14%

-1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.20%

12.37%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

13.74%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.69%

15.79%

-3.10%

RPAR vs. DBEF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RPAR has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than DBEF's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

RPAR vs. DBEF - Dividend Comparison

RPAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, less than DBEF's 5.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEF
Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Hedged Equity ETF
5.03%5.55%1.29%4.46%15.85%2.28%2.41%3.03%3.22%2.98%2.55%3.70%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.07%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RPAR and DBEF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEF has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to RPAR (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RPAR dropped -30.16% vs DBEF's -32.46%.

On 5-year performance, DBEF leads with 13.11% vs 1.76% for RPAR. On fees, DBEF is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, RPAR has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DBEF has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 1.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DBEF is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for RPAR.

DBEF has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 2.07% for RPAR.

They also come from different issuers: Toroso Investments and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for RPAR and 0.36% for DBEF.

RPAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RPAR and DBEF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer