ROUS vs. PGHY
ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROUS returned 12.77%/yr vs 4.32%/yr for PGHY. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PGHY.
Performance
ROUS vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly higher than PGHY's 2.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed PGHY with an annualized return of 12.77%, while PGHY has yielded a comparatively lower 4.32% annualized return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.22%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 6M
- 14.17%
- 1Y
- 26.47%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
ROUS vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 14.41% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 22.88% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 3.04% | 5.87% | 0.38% | 2.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and PGHY is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2015 | 0.30 |
ROUS vs. PGHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROUS
PGHY
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ROUS
PGHY
Healthcare
ROUS
PGHY
Financial Services
ROUS
PGHY
Industrials
ROUS
PGHY
Consumer Cyclical
ROUS
PGHY
Communication Services
ROUS
PGHY
Consumer Defensive
ROUS
PGHY
Utilities
ROUS
PGHY
Energy
ROUS
PGHY
Basic Materials
ROUS
PGHY
Real Estate
ROUS
PGHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
PGHY
ROUS vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.27 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.45 | 2.48 | +1.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.21 | 9.56 | +8.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 1.49 | +0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.83 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | 0.61 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.60 | +0.06 |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than PGHY's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and PGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -20.50% | -15.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -3.04% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -5.03% | -10.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -9.42% | -9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | -20.50% | -15.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.86% | -0.80% | -1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -1.64% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 0.79% | +0.67% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) at 2.00%. This indicates that ROUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.19% | 2.00% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.76% | 3.73% | +5.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.52% | 5.06% | +6.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 5.45% | +8.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 7.04% | +9.93% |
ROUS vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than PGHY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROUS vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than PGHY's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROUS and PGHY have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs PGHY's -20.50%.
On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.77% vs 4.32% for PGHY. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.77% return vs 4.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 1.35% for ROUS.
ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PGHY is High Yield Bonds. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.35% for PGHY.
ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROUS and PGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer