PGHY vs. BSJS
PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) and BSJS (Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds from Invesco - PGHY tracks the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index while BSJS tracks the Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PGHY returned 4.65%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for BSJS. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PGHY charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for BSJS.
Performance
PGHY vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.80% return, which is significantly higher than BSJS's 1.72% return.
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 2.80%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 8.34%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.46%
BSJS
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.34%
- 5Y*
- 3.31%
- 10Y*
- —
PGHY vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.80% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 4.08% |
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.72% | 8.31% | 7.38% | 12.28% | -13.69% | 3.40% | 4.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between PGHY and BSJS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2020 | 0.47 |
PGHY vs. BSJS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PGHY
BSJS
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Industrials
Healthcare
Technology
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Financial Services
PGHY
BSJS
Communication Services
PGHY
BSJS
Consumer Cyclical
PGHY
BSJS
Basic Materials
PGHY
BSJS
Energy
PGHY
BSJS
Industrials
PGHY
BSJS
Healthcare
PGHY
BSJS
Technology
PGHY
BSJS
Utilities
PGHY
BSJS
Consumer Defensive
PGHY
BSJS
Real Estate
PGHY
BSJS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PGHY vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank
PGHY
BSJS
PGHY vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PGHY | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.68 | 2.34 | -0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.56 | 3.64 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.46 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 4.10 | -1.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.08 | 20.02 | -8.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PGHY | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.68 | 2.34 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.45 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.53 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
PGHY vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and BSJS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PGHY | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.50% | -17.73% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -1.64% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.03% | -4.44% | -0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.42% | -17.73% | +8.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.64% | -4.00% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.34% | +0.44% |
Volatility
PGHY vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) has a higher volatility of 1.96% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) at 0.78%. This indicates that PGHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PGHY | BSJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.96% | 0.78% | +1.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.67% | 2.05% | +1.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.00% | 2.84% | +2.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.44% | 7.39% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 7.15% | -0.11% |
PGHY vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
PGHY vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison
PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.07%, more than BSJS's 6.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSJS Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 6.27% | 6.49% | 7.04% | 6.75% | 5.82% | 4.86% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.07% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PGHY and BSJS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PGHY has higher volatility (1.96%) compared to BSJS (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs BSJS's -17.73%.
On 5-year performance, PGHY leads with 4.65% vs 3.31% for BSJS. On fees, PGHY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BSJS has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PGHY has performed better with a 4.65% return vs 3.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PGHY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.07%, compared with 6.27% for BSJS.
PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.42% for BSJS.
BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PGHY and BSJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer