PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHY vs. BSJS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHY vs. BSJS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than BSJS's 2.27% return.


PGHY

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.54%
6M
1.38%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
4.14%
ALL TIME*
4.14%

BSJS

1D
0.09%
1M
0.25%
6M
1.76%
YTD
2.27%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
8.14%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.78M$4.52M$3.44M
$921.90K$935.56K$975.15K

PGHY vs. BSJS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
2.42%8.88%8.39%10.15%-5.50%1.22%3.04%
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
2.27%8.31%7.38%12.28%-13.69%3.40%3.92%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHY and BSJS is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020

0.47

The correlation between PGHY and BSJS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHY vs. BSJS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

BSJS
BSJS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BSJS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSJS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSJS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BSJS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSJS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGHY vs. BSJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGHYBSJSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.38

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

3.23

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

15.84

-8.69

PGHY vs. BSJS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the BSJS Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHY and BSJS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGHY vs. BSJS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, which is greater than BSJS's maximum drawdown of -17.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and BSJS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHYBSJSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-17.73%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-1.64%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-4.44%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.38%

-17.73%

+8.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-3.89%

+2.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.33%

+0.47%

Volatility

PGHY vs. BSJS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJS) at 0.59%. This indicates that PGHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHYBSJSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.59%

+0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.86%

2.10%

+1.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.99%

2.73%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

7.38%

-1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

7.05%

-0.05%

PGHY vs. BSJS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PGHY has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BSJS's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

PGHY vs. BSJS - Dividend Comparison

PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than BSJS's 6.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSJS
Invesco BulletShares 2028 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
6.16%6.49%7.04%6.75%5.82%4.86%0.75%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.16%7.24%7.49%7.87%5.12%5.17%5.45%5.32%5.45%5.52%6.26%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHY and BSJS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PGHY has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to BSJS (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs BSJS's -17.73%.

On 5-year performance, PGHY leads with 4.66% vs 3.13% for BSJS. On fees, PGHY is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PGHY has performed better with a 4.66% return vs 3.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PGHY is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for BSJS.

PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 6.16% for BSJS.

PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while BSJS tracks Nasdaq BulletSharesUSD High Yield Corporate Bond 2028 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PGHY and 0.42% for BSJS.

BSJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHY and BSJS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer