PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PGHY vs. HYDB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PGHY vs. HYDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (HYDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PGHY achieves a 2.42% return, which is significantly higher than HYDB's 1.34% return.


PGHY

1D
-0.15%
1M
-0.54%
6M
1.38%
YTD
2.42%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
8.37%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
4.14%
ALL TIME*
4.14%

HYDB

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.41%
6M
0.57%
YTD
1.34%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$7.23M$7.91M$8.88M
$921.90K$935.56K$975.15K

PGHY vs. HYDB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
2.42%8.88%8.39%10.15%-5.50%1.22%3.04%5.87%0.38%0.26%
HYDB
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
1.34%8.10%9.11%14.02%-9.99%5.14%7.39%16.13%-3.18%3.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PGHY and HYDB is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2017

0.42

The correlation between PGHY and HYDB shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.56 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PGHY vs. HYDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PGHY
PGHY Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PGHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PGHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PGHY Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
PGHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PGHY Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

HYDB
HYDB Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
HYDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYDB Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
HYDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYDB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PGHY vs. HYDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) and iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (HYDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PGHYHYDBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

1.73

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

7.48

-0.33

PGHY vs. HYDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PGHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the HYDB Sharpe Ratio of 1.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PGHY and HYDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PGHY vs. HYDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PGHY drawdown since its inception was -20.50%, smaller than the maximum HYDB drawdown of -21.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PGHY and HYDB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PGHYHYDBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.50%

-21.58%

+1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.04%

-2.83%

-0.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-5.58%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.38%

-14.28%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-0.51%

-0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.63%

-2.35%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.80%

0.65%

+0.15%

Volatility

PGHY vs. HYDB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) is 0.63%, while iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF (HYDB) has a volatility of 0.76%. This indicates that PGHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HYDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PGHYHYDBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.76%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.86%

3.07%

+0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.99%

3.81%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

7.05%

-1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.00%

7.70%

-0.70%

PGHY vs. HYDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PGHY and HYDB have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

PGHY vs. HYDB - Dividend Comparison

PGHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.16%, more than HYDB's 7.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYDB
iShares High Yield Systematic Bond ETF
6.40%7.04%6.95%7.00%6.30%4.70%5.81%5.68%6.16%2.70%0.00%0.00%
PGHY
Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF
7.16%7.24%7.49%7.87%5.12%5.17%5.45%5.32%5.45%5.52%6.26%4.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


PGHY and HYDB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HYDB has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to PGHY (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PGHY dropped -20.50% vs HYDB's -21.58%.

On 5-year performance, PGHY leads with 4.66% vs 4.44% for HYDB. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PGHY has performed better with a 4.66% return vs 4.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PGHY and HYDB have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.16%, compared with 6.40% for HYDB.

PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index, while HYDB tracks BlackRock High Yield Defensive Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.

HYDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PGHY and HYDB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer