PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. OUSA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. OUSA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than OUSA's 7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ROUS has outperformed OUSA with an annualized return of 12.68%, while OUSA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.40% annualized return.


ROUS

1D
0.57%
1M
0.96%
6M
11.60%
YTD
17.13%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
ALL TIME*
11.05%

OUSA

1D
0.53%
1M
2.40%
6M
3.84%
YTD
7.09%
1Y
16.21%
3Y*
13.56%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
10.40%
ALL TIME*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$872.37K$1.31M$1.44M
$3.40M$3.69M$3.28M

ROUS vs. OUSA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
17.13%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%22.88%
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
7.09%10.23%17.09%13.44%-9.33%23.75%6.96%25.03%-3.11%18.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and OUSA is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between ROUS and OUSA has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

ROUS vs. OUSA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROUS
OUSA

Technology

35.2%
23.7%

Healthcare

11.1%
15.1%

Financial Services

11.1%
18.6%

Industrials

10.4%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
13.1%

Communication Services

6.3%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
7.4%

Utilities

3.7%

-

Energy

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.2%

-

Basic Materials

2.1%

-

Technology

ROUS
35.2%
OUSA
23.7%

Healthcare

ROUS
11.1%
OUSA
15.1%

Financial Services

ROUS
11.1%
OUSA
18.6%

Industrials

ROUS
10.4%
OUSA
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.1%
OUSA
13.1%

Communication Services

ROUS
6.3%
OUSA
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.4%
OUSA
7.4%

Utilities

ROUS
3.7%
OUSA

-

Energy

ROUS
2.7%
OUSA

-

Real Estate

ROUS
2.2%
OUSA

-

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.1%
OUSA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. OUSA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

OUSA
OUSA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
OUSA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OUSA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
OUSA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
OUSA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
OUSA Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROUS vs. OUSA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROUSOUSADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

1.95

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.56

6.80

+11.76

ROUS vs. OUSA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the OUSA Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and OUSA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. OUSA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than OUSA's maximum drawdown of -33.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and OUSA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSOUSADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-33.12%

-2.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-8.36%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-13.14%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-19.54%

+0.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

-33.12%

-2.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-0.23%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-3.50%

-0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

2.39%

-0.88%

Volatility

ROUS vs. OUSA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.46%, while OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF (OUSA) has a volatility of 3.65%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OUSA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSOUSADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

3.65%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

8.12%

+0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

10.25%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

13.38%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

15.19%

+1.73%

ROUS vs. OUSA - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than OUSA's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROUS vs. OUSA - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than OUSA's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
OUSA
OShares U.S. Quality Dividend ETF
1.35%1.39%1.50%1.81%1.92%1.56%2.03%2.31%3.06%2.15%2.32%1.17%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and OUSA have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OUSA has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to ROUS (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs OUSA's -33.12%.

On 10-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.68% vs 10.40% for OUSA. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.68% return vs 10.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for OUSA.

OUSA has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OUSA is Quality Factor. ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while OUSA tracks O'Shares US Quality Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and O'Shares Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.48% for OUSA.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and OUSA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer