PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ROUS having a 16.55% return and MFUS slightly lower at 16.37%.


ROUS

1D
0.01%
1M
6.18%
YTD
16.55%
6M
16.75%
1Y
29.42%
3Y*
20.87%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
13.01%

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
16.55%15.21%17.61%15.05%-9.65%27.33%6.61%23.94%-9.59%13.42%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and MFUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.92

The correlation between ROUS and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROUS vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROUS
MFUS

Technology

33.2%
21.8%

Healthcare

10.7%
13.5%

Financial Services

10.6%
12.6%

Industrials

10.4%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
10.6%

Communication Services

8.6%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
10.3%

Utilities

3.8%
1.7%

Energy

3.0%
7.0%

Basic Materials

2.2%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.1%
1.8%

Technology

ROUS
33.2%
MFUS
21.8%

Healthcare

ROUS
10.7%
MFUS
13.5%

Financial Services

ROUS
10.6%
MFUS
12.6%

Industrials

ROUS
10.4%
MFUS
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.6%
MFUS
10.6%

Communication Services

ROUS
8.6%
MFUS
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.8%
MFUS
10.3%

Utilities

ROUS
3.8%
MFUS
1.7%

Energy

ROUS
3.0%
MFUS
7.0%

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.2%
MFUS
2.8%

Real Estate

ROUS
2.1%
MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ROUSMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.47

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

4.41

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.38

18.13

+2.25

ROUS vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ROUSMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.63

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.86

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.79

-0.12

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-35.21%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-6.39%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

-15.39%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

-18.22%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.24%

-4.00%

-0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

1.55%

-0.10%

Volatility

ROUS vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.54%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.19%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.50%

8.22%

+0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.37%

10.72%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.38%

15.03%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.96%

17.35%

-0.39%

ROUS vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROUS vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ROUS and MFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.84% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer