ROUS vs. MFUS
ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index while MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROUS returned 12.84%/yr vs 12.82%/yr for MFUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for MFUS.
Performance
ROUS vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ROUS having a 16.55% return and MFUS slightly lower at 16.37%.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.72%
- YTD
- 16.37%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.25%
- 5Y*
- 12.82%
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.55% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 13.42% |
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.37% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and MFUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between ROUS and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROUS vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROUS
MFUS
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ROUS
MFUS
Healthcare
ROUS
MFUS
Financial Services
ROUS
MFUS
Industrials
ROUS
MFUS
Consumer Cyclical
ROUS
MFUS
Communication Services
ROUS
MFUS
Consumer Defensive
ROUS
MFUS
Utilities
ROUS
MFUS
Energy
ROUS
MFUS
Basic Materials
ROUS
MFUS
Real Estate
ROUS
MFUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
MFUS
ROUS vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 4.41 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.38 | 18.13 | +2.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.63 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.86 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.79 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, roughly equal to the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and MFUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -35.21% | -0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -6.39% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | -15.39% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | -18.22% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -4.00% | -0.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 1.55% | -0.10% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.54%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | MFUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.19% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 8.22% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 10.72% | +0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 15.03% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 17.35% | -0.39% |
ROUS vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROUS vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than MFUS's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.36% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, ROUS and MFUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs MFUS's -35.21%.
On 5-year performance, ROUS leads with 12.84% vs 12.82% for MFUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 12.84% return vs 12.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.36%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.
ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROUS and MFUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer