ROUS vs. GPIQ
ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while GPIQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. ROUS is passively managed, while GPIQ is actively managed. Over the past year, ROUS returned 29.42% vs 37.50% for GPIQ. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for GPIQ.
Performance
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.55% return, which is significantly lower than GPIQ's 18.30% return.
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 16.55%
- 6M
- 16.75%
- 1Y
- 29.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.87%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.01%
GPIQ
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 8.51%
- YTD
- 18.30%
- 6M
- 17.64%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.55% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 13.31% |
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 18.30% | 19.77% | 23.22% | 15.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROUS and GPIQ is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ROUS and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROUS
GPIQ
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
ROUS
GPIQ
Healthcare
ROUS
GPIQ
Financial Services
ROUS
GPIQ
Industrials
ROUS
GPIQ
Consumer Cyclical
ROUS
GPIQ
Communication Services
ROUS
GPIQ
Consumer Defensive
ROUS
GPIQ
Utilities
ROUS
GPIQ
Energy
ROUS
GPIQ
Basic Materials
ROUS
GPIQ
Real Estate
ROUS
GPIQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROUS vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank
ROUS
GPIQ
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.51 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 3.96 | +0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.38 | 17.48 | +2.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | 2.81 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 1.78 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and GPIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -21.06% | -14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -9.51% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.19% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.24% | -2.27% | -1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 2.15% | -0.70% |
Volatility
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.54%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROUS | GPIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.54% | 3.39% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.50% | 10.44% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.37% | 13.40% | -2.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 17.47% | -3.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 17.47% | -0.51% |
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROUS vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison
ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than GPIQ's 9.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF | 9.32% | 9.81% | 9.18% | 1.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROUS and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GPIQ has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to ROUS (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.
On 1-year performance, GPIQ leads with 37.50% vs 29.42% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GPIQ has performed better with a 37.50% return vs 29.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.
ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.29% for GPIQ.
GPIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROUS and GPIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer