PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROUS vs. GPIQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 17.13% return, which is significantly higher than GPIQ's 13.18% return.


ROUS

1D
0.57%
1M
0.96%
6M
11.60%
YTD
17.13%
1Y
27.87%
3Y*
19.09%
5Y*
12.22%
10Y*
12.68%
ALL TIME*
11.05%

GPIQ

1D
1.36%
1M
-1.54%
6M
10.62%
YTD
13.18%
1Y
25.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.39M$82.61M$83.97M
$3.40M$3.69M$3.28M

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
17.13%15.21%17.61%12.84%
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
13.18%19.77%23.22%15.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and GPIQ is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2023

0.73

The correlation between ROUS and GPIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROUS
GPIQ

Technology

35.2%
60.7%

Healthcare

11.1%
3.7%

Financial Services

11.1%
0.2%

Industrials

10.4%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
10.1%

Communication Services

6.3%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
6.4%

Utilities

3.7%
1.4%

Energy

2.7%
0.5%

Real Estate

2.2%
0.1%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.1%

Technology

ROUS
35.2%
GPIQ
60.7%

Healthcare

ROUS
11.1%
GPIQ
3.7%

Financial Services

ROUS
11.1%
GPIQ
0.2%

Industrials

ROUS
10.4%
GPIQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ROUS
9.1%
GPIQ
10.1%

Communication Services

ROUS
6.3%
GPIQ
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

ROUS
5.4%
GPIQ
6.4%

Utilities

ROUS
3.7%
GPIQ
1.4%

Energy

ROUS
2.7%
GPIQ
0.5%

Real Estate

ROUS
2.2%
GPIQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

ROUS
2.1%
GPIQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROUS vs. GPIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROUS
ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

GPIQ
GPIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GPIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GPIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
GPIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GPIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
GPIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROUSGPIQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.69

2.73

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.56

9.62

+8.93

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the GPIQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and GPIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than GPIQ's maximum drawdown of -21.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and GPIQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROUSGPIQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.51%

-21.06%

-14.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.97%

-9.51%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-4.62%

+4.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.19%

-2.34%

-1.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.51%

2.69%

-1.18%

Volatility

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 2.46%, while Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF (GPIQ) has a volatility of 6.41%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GPIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROUSGPIQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

6.41%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.70%

14.11%

-5.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.59%

16.68%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.43%

18.06%

-3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.92%

18.06%

-1.14%

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GPIQ's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROUS vs. GPIQ - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than GPIQ's 10.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GPIQ
Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Core Premium Income ETF
10.15%9.81%9.18%1.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROUS
Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF
1.32%1.52%1.62%1.91%1.88%1.38%2.01%2.12%1.89%1.54%1.97%1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROUS and GPIQ have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GPIQ has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to ROUS (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs GPIQ's -21.06%.

On 1-year performance, ROUS leads with 27.87% vs 25.84% for GPIQ. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ROUS has performed better with a 27.87% return vs 25.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for GPIQ.

GPIQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.15%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GPIQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.29% for GPIQ.

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROUS and GPIQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer