ROUS vs. DFIV

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROUS is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index, while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. ROUS is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ROUS returned 20.15%/yr vs 23.38%/yr for DFIV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROUS charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.

Performance

ROUS vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROUS achieves a 16.78% return, which is significantly higher than DFIV's 12.20% return.

ROUS

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 4.90%
• YTD: 16.78%
• 6M: 16.06%
• 1Y: 30.86%
• 3Y*: 20.15%
• 5Y*: 12.73%
• 10Y*: 13.26%

DFIV

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 1.88%
• YTD: 12.20%
• 6M: 13.92%
• 1Y: 34.38%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROUS vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	16.78%	15.21%	17.61%	15.05%	-9.65%	7.46%
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	12.20%	45.36%	7.26%	17.75%	-3.70%	0.50%

Correlation

The correlation between ROUS and DFIV is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021	0.69

The correlation between ROUS and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROUS vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROUS	DFIV
Technology	37.3%	3.2%
Healthcare	10.3%	4.9%
Financial Services	9.9%	32.4%
Industrials	9.8%	9.8%
Consumer Cyclical	9.1%	10.0%
Communication Services	8.1%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	4.9%
Utilities	3.5%	2.2%
Energy	2.6%	15.3%
Basic Materials	2.1%	11.4%
Real Estate	2.0%	1.7%

Return for Risk

ROUS vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROUS

ROUS Risk / Return Rank: 88
ROUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
ROUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
ROUS Omega Ratio Rank: 84
ROUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ROUS Martin Ratio Rank: 92

DFIV

DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 82
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROUS vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROUS	DFIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	2.39	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.50	3.26	+0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.43	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.91	3.48	+1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.95	13.34	+6.60

ROUS vs. DFIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is comparable to the DFIV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROUS and DFIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROUS vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROUS drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROUS and DFIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROUS	DFIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.51%	-25.42%	-10.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.97%	-9.66%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.81%	-14.72%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.91%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.51%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.43%	+0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-4.46%	+0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.47%	2.52%	-1.05%

Volatility

ROUS vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) is 3.78%, while Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a volatility of 4.50%. This indicates that ROUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROUS	DFIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	4.50%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.97%	11.46%	-2.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.69%	14.10%	-2.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	16.66%	-2.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	16.66%	+0.32%

ROUS vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROUS has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ROUS vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison

ROUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than DFIV's 2.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF	2.54%	2.92%	3.88%	3.93%	3.84%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF	1.32%	1.52%	1.62%	1.91%	1.88%	1.38%	2.01%	2.12%	1.89%	1.54%	1.97%	1.62%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROUS and DFIV in my portfolio?

ROUS and DFIV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROUS or DFIV?

DFIV has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to ROUS (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROUS dropped -35.51% vs DFIV's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, ROUS or DFIV?

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.38% vs 20.15% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROUS or DFIV?

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.38% return vs 20.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROUS or DFIV?

ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROUS or DFIV?

DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.

What is the main difference between ROUS and DFIV?

ROUS is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for ROUS and 0.27% for DFIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.