ROMO vs. SMOM
ROMO (Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. ROMO is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROMO charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
ROMO vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than SMOM's 9.82% return.
ROMO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 3.99%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 7.08%
- 1Y
- 17.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.78%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROMO vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF | 6.33% | 4.41% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROMO and SMOM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROMO vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
ROMO
SMOM
ROMO vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.45 | -0.97 |
Drawdowns
ROMO vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.66% | -7.45% | -21.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.62% | 0.00% | -1.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -1.48% | -6.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | — | — |
Volatility
ROMO vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROMO | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.58% | 12.62% | +0.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.03% | 12.62% | -0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.45% | 12.62% | +1.83% |
ROMO vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROMO vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF | 8.34% | 8.87% | 0.76% | 2.42% | 0.77% | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.58% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROMO and SMOM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMOM is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMOM is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for ROMO.
ROMO has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
ROMO is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Rational Capital LLC and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for ROMO and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for ROMO and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer