ROMO vs. BLNDX

In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a -1.44% return, which is significantly higher than BLNDX's -7.83% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ROMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMO and BLNDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than BLNDX's 6.22% yield.

The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and BLNDX.

The current volatility for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) is 1.73%, while Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) has a volatility of 2.78%. This indicates that ROMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.