ROMO vs. BLNDX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ROMO (Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF) and BLNDX (Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional) are both funds - ROMO is a Momentum fund tracking the Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index, while BLNDX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Ultimus Fund. Over the past 5 years, ROMO returned 6.88%/yr vs 9.26%/yr for BLNDX. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROMO charges 0.82%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for BLNDX.

Performance

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than BLNDX's 12.91% return.

ROMO

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 6.18%
• 6M: 6.21%
• 1Y: 18.57%
• 3Y*: 14.40%
• 5Y*: 6.88%
• 10Y*: —

BLNDX

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -3.47%
• YTD: 12.91%
• 6M: 12.69%
• 1Y: 30.93%
• 3Y*: 10.21%
• 5Y*: 9.26%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF	6.18%	9.29%	20.68%	11.05%	-18.88%	21.41%	-3.48%	0.05%
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	12.91%	4.12%	13.11%	5.79%	3.71%	20.16%	16.30%	0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ROMO and BLNDX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.65
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2019	0.62

The correlation between ROMO and BLNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ROMO vs. BLNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROMO

ROMO Risk / Return Rank: 38
ROMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
ROMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
ROMO Omega Ratio Rank: 39
ROMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
ROMO Martin Ratio Rank: 39

BLNDX

BLNDX Risk / Return Rank: 81
BLNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
BLNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
BLNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
BLNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
BLNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROMO	BLNDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.40	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	3.14	-1.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.42	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.67	5.89	-4.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.95	18.90	-12.95

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the BLNDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMO and BLNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, which is greater than BLNDX's maximum drawdown of -17.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and BLNDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROMO	BLNDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.66%	-17.69%	-10.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.16%	-5.19%	-5.97%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.09%	-17.69%	+3.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.26%	-17.69%	-2.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-4.73%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.26%	-3.19%	-5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	1.61%	+1.52%

Volatility

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional (BLNDX) at 3.59%. This indicates that ROMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROMO	BLNDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.34%	3.59%	+0.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	9.91%	+1.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.04%	12.74%	+1.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.14%	11.71%	+0.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.48%	11.77%	+2.71%

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than BLNDX's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROMO vs. BLNDX - Dividend Comparison

ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than BLNDX's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BLNDX Standpoint Multi-Asset Fund Institutional	0.65%	0.73%	5.74%	3.71%	2.67%	6.11%	1.21%	0.00%
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF	8.36%	8.87%	0.76%	2.42%	0.77%	0.56%	0.97%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROMO and BLNDX in my portfolio?

ROMO and BLNDX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROMO or BLNDX?

ROMO has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to BLNDX (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROMO dropped -28.66% vs BLNDX's -17.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BLNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.