ROMO vs. QTR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR).

ROMO and QTR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROMO is a passively managed fund by Rational Capital LLC that tracks the performance of the Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2019. QTR is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Quarterly Protective Put 90 Index. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021. Both ROMO and QTR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ROMO vs. QTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ROMO vs. QTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF	-0.85%	9.29%	20.68%	11.05%	-18.88%	5.76%
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	-7.25%	14.52%	21.46%	45.53%	-29.94%	4.16%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a -0.85% return, which is significantly higher than QTR's -7.25% return.

ROMO

• 1D: 2.82%
• 1M: -8.01%
• YTD: -0.85%
• 6M: 1.90%
• 1Y: 12.49%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 6.20%
• 10Y*: —

QTR

• 1D: 1.82%
• 1M: -5.65%
• YTD: -7.25%
• 6M: -6.08%
• 1Y: 16.96%
• 3Y*: 17.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROMO vs. QTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than QTR's 0.60% expense ratio.

ROMO

Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF

QTR

Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF

Return for Risk

ROMO vs. QTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROMO

ROMO Risk / Return Rank: 46
ROMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
ROMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ROMO Omega Ratio Rank: 46
ROMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ROMO Martin Ratio Rank: 47

QTR

QTR Risk / Return Rank: 57
QTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
QTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QTR Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
QTR Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROMO vs. QTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROMO	QTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	1.04	-0.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	1.56	-0.29
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.20	-0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.36	-0.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.49	4.83	-0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROMO vs. QTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROMO Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the QTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROMO and QTR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROMO	QTR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	1.04	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	0.39	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between ROMO and QTR is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

ROMO vs. QTR - Dividend Comparison

ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, less than QTR's 20.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF	8.95%	8.87%	0.76%	2.42%	0.77%	0.56%	0.97%	0.58%
QTR Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF	20.24%	18.77%	0.50%	0.53%	0.36%	1.90%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

ROMO vs. QTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, smaller than the maximum QTR drawdown of -31.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and QTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROMO	QTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.66%	-31.72%	+3.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.16%	-12.29%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.26%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.26%	-10.69%	+2.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.43%	-9.10%	+0.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.73%	3.45%	-0.72%

Volatility

ROMO vs. QTR - Volatility Comparison

Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) at 4.90%. This indicates that ROMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROMO	QTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.34%	4.90%	+2.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.61%	10.80%	-0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.16%	16.44%	-2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.90%	18.16%	-6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.43%	18.16%	-3.73%