ROMO vs. SPMO
ROMO (Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - ROMO tracks the Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index while SPMO tracks the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROMO returned 6.88%/yr vs 24.25%/yr for SPMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROMO charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
ROMO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROMO achieves a 6.18% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 36.08% return.
ROMO
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 6.18%
- 6M
- 6.21%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 14.40%
- 5Y*
- 6.88%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 11.71%
- YTD
- 36.08%
- 6M
- 35.05%
- 1Y
- 52.78%
- 3Y*
- 44.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.25%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
ROMO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF | 6.18% | 9.29% | 20.68% | 11.05% | -18.88% | 21.41% | -3.48% | 4.25% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 36.08% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 4.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROMO and SPMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.73 |
The correlation between ROMO and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROMO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
ROMO
SPMO
ROMO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROMO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.48 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 4.18 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 15.78 | -9.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROMO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROMO drawdown since its inception was -28.66%, smaller than the maximum SPMO drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROMO and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROMO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.66% | -30.95% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.16% | -12.70% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | -20.13% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.26% | -22.74% | +2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | 0.00% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.26% | -4.59% | -3.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 3.35% | -0.22% |
Volatility
ROMO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF (ROMO) is 4.34%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.55%. This indicates that ROMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROMO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 10.55% | -6.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 17.11% | -5.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.04% | 20.05% | -6.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 19.77% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 20.55% | -6.07% |
ROMO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROMO has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROMO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
ROMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.36%, more than SPMO's 0.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROMO Strategy Shares Newfound/ReSolve Robust Momentum ETF | 8.36% | 8.87% | 0.76% | 2.42% | 0.77% | 0.56% | 0.97% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROMO and SPMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (10.55%) compared to ROMO (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROMO dropped -28.66% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.25% vs 6.88% for ROMO. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, ROMO has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.25% return vs 6.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for ROMO.
ROMO has the higher dividend yield at 8.36%, compared with 0.78% for SPMO.
ROMO tracks Newfound/ReSolve Robust Equity Momentum Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Rational Capital LLC and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for ROMO and 0.13% for SPMO.
SPMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROMO and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer