ROM vs. UGA
ROM (ProShares Ultra Technology) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - ROM is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROM returned 41.99%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ROM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
ROM vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROM achieves a 54.49% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, ROM has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 41.99%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.
ROM
- 1D
- -8.19%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 54.49%
- 6M
- 49.89%
- 1Y
- 107.69%
- 3Y*
- 51.07%
- 5Y*
- 25.64%
- 10Y*
- 41.99%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
ROM vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 54.49% | 35.63% | 31.65% | 130.70% | -63.86% | 77.75% | 80.42% | 102.10% | -9.89% | 81.11% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROM and UGA is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.20 |
The correlation between ROM and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROM vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
ROM
UGA
ROM vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROM | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.30 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 3.17 | +0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.82 | 9.39 | +0.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROM vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROM drawdown since its inception was -83.36%, roughly equal to the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROM and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROM | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.36% | -86.59% | +3.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.33% | -18.96% | -13.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.10% | -26.68% | -21.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.55% | -38.11% | -29.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -75.89% | +8.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.82% | -18.05% | +3.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.85% | -36.69% | +15.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.01% | 6.43% | +4.58% |
Volatility
ROM vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Technology (ROM) has a higher volatility of 25.39% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that ROM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROM | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.39% | 9.24% | +16.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.61% | 30.57% | +9.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.11% | 35.22% | +11.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.53% | 34.45% | +18.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.23% | 37.22% | +13.01% |
ROM vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROM vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
ROM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROM ProShares Ultra Technology | 0.16% | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.30% | 0.08% | 0.20% | 0.12% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROM and UGA have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROM has higher volatility (25.39%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROM dropped -83.36% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, ROM leads with 41.99% vs 14.31% for UGA. On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ROM has performed better with a 41.99% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROM.
ROM has the higher dividend yield at 0.16%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
ROM is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. ROM tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Index (200%), while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROM and 0.75% for UGA.
ROM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROM and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer