ROE vs. FNDF

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ROE (Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF) and FNDF (Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Astoria, while FNDF is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity Developed ex US Large Index (Net). ROE is actively managed, while FNDF is passively managed. Over the past year, ROE returned 38.24% vs 43.94% for FNDF. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROE charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDF.

Performance

ROE vs. FNDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ROE having a 21.08% return and FNDF slightly lower at 20.97%.

ROE

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 6.88%
• YTD: 21.08%
• 6M: 21.44%
• 1Y: 38.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDF

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 5.03%
• YTD: 20.97%
• 6M: 24.09%
• 1Y: 43.94%
• 3Y*: 24.21%
• 5Y*: 13.31%
• 10Y*: 11.80%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROE vs. FNDF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	21.08%	17.20%	18.34%	4.29%
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	20.97%	40.99%	2.29%	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ROE and FNDF is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2023	0.69

The correlation between ROE and FNDF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROE vs. FNDF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROE	FNDF
Technology	36.1%	11.1%
Financial Services	11.7%	16.7%
Communication Services	10.6%	4.9%
Industrials	9.8%	15.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	10.7%
Healthcare	8.7%	5.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	6.9%
Energy	3.5%	12.3%
Utilities	1.9%	3.8%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.9%
Basic Materials	1.8%	11.3%

Return for Risk

ROE vs. FNDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROE

ROE Risk / Return Rank: 85
ROE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
ROE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
ROE Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ROE Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
ROE Martin Ratio Rank: 89

FNDF

FNDF Risk / Return Rank: 85
FNDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FNDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FNDF Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROE vs. FNDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) and Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ROE	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	2.94	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.71	3.83	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.52	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.44	4.17	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.05	15.91	+4.14
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ROE vs. FNDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROE Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the FNDF Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROE and FNDF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ROE	FNDF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	2.94	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.83	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.39	0.54	+0.85

Drawdowns

ROE vs. FNDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROE drawdown since its inception was -19.10%, smaller than the maximum FNDF drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROE and FNDF.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROE	FNDF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.10%	-40.14%	+21.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.66%	-10.60%	+1.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.56%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-40.14%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.87%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.58%	-7.64%	+5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.91%	2.77%	-0.86%

Volatility

ROE vs. FNDF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF (ROE) is 3.69%, while Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF (FNDF) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that ROE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROE	FNDF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.69%	5.10%	-1.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	12.53%	-1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.92%	15.04%	-1.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.77%	16.18%	-0.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.77%	17.67%	-1.90%

ROE vs. FNDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROE has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDF's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROE vs. FNDF - Dividend Comparison

ROE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than FNDF's 2.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FNDF Schwab Fundamental International Equity ETF	2.84%	3.44%	4.01%	3.41%	3.10%	3.54%	2.17%	3.20%	3.47%	2.32%	2.42%	2.08%
ROE Astoria US Equal Weight Quality Kings ETF	0.94%	0.97%	1.18%	0.68%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROE and FNDF in my portfolio?

ROE and FNDF have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROE or FNDF?

FNDF has higher volatility (5.10%) compared to ROE (3.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROE dropped -19.10% vs FNDF's -40.14%.

Which ETF is better, ROE or FNDF?

On 1-year performance, FNDF leads with 43.94% vs 38.24% for ROE. On fees, FNDF is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ROE has been the lower-risk option at 3.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROE or FNDF?

Over the 1-year period, FNDF has performed better with a 43.94% return vs 38.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROE or FNDF?

FNDF is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for ROE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROE or FNDF?

FNDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.84%, compared with 0.94% for ROE.

What is the main difference between ROE and FNDF?

ROE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FNDF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Astoria and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for ROE and 0.25% for FNDF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.