PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RODM vs. VIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RODM vs. VIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RODM achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, RODM has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 9.30%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.


RODM

1D
0.10%
1M
0.36%
YTD
12.24%
6M
13.78%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
20.24%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
9.30%

VIG

1D
0.53%
1M
2.11%
YTD
7.68%
6M
6.99%
1Y
19.52%
3Y*
15.98%
5Y*
10.74%
10Y*
13.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RODM vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
12.24%34.42%8.02%15.76%-14.54%11.11%-0.62%17.15%-9.97%25.14%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
7.68%14.17%16.99%14.51%-9.80%23.76%15.43%29.62%-2.08%22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RODM and VIG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.67

The correlation between RODM and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

RODM vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RODM
VIG

Financial Services

25.9%
20.6%

Industrials

16.6%
11.8%

Technology

10.8%
26.2%

Healthcare

8.9%
16.5%

Energy

6.8%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.4%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
4.7%

Communication Services

5.5%
0.5%

Utilities

4.9%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
10.1%

Real Estate

3.5%

-

Financial Services

RODM
25.9%
VIG
20.6%

Industrials

RODM
16.6%
VIG
11.8%

Technology

RODM
10.8%
VIG
26.2%

Healthcare

RODM
8.9%
VIG
16.5%

Energy

RODM
6.8%
VIG
3.5%

Basic Materials

RODM
6.4%
VIG
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

RODM
5.8%
VIG
4.7%

Communication Services

RODM
5.5%
VIG
0.5%

Utilities

RODM
4.9%
VIG
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

RODM
4.0%
VIG
10.1%

Real Estate

RODM
3.5%
VIG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RODM vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RODM
RODM Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

VIG
VIG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIG Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RODM vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RODMVIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.58

2.32

+1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.22

9.34

+4.88

RODM vs. VIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RODM Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the VIG Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RODM and VIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RODM vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RODM drawdown since its inception was -35.98%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RODM and VIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RODMVIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-46.81%

+10.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.10%

-7.91%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.58%

-14.95%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.85%

-20.39%

-8.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.98%

-31.72%

-4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.33%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-5.51%

-0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

1.96%

-0.18%

Volatility

RODM vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) has a higher volatility of 3.54% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.93%. This indicates that RODM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RODMVIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

2.93%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.76%

7.78%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.02%

10.19%

+0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.47%

14.25%

-0.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.21%

16.06%

-0.85%

RODM vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RODM has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

RODM vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison

RODM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
2.77%3.11%4.09%4.42%3.81%4.41%2.82%2.82%2.03%2.24%3.19%2.60%
VIG
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF
1.47%1.62%1.73%1.88%1.96%1.55%1.63%1.71%2.08%1.88%2.14%2.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


RODM and VIG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RODM has higher volatility (3.54%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RODM dropped -35.98% vs VIG's -46.81%.

On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 9.30% for RODM. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 9.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for RODM.

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.77%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.

RODM is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VIG is Dividend. RODM tracks Hartford Risk-Optimized Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for RODM and 0.04% for VIG.

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RODM and VIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer