ROBT vs. GXPT
ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) and GXPT (Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - ROBT tracks the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index while GXPT tracks the MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBT charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPT.
Performance
ROBT vs. GXPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than GXPT's 16.86% return.
ROBT
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
GXPT
- 1D
- -3.44%
- 1M
- -0.96%
- YTD
- 16.86%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT vs. GXPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 3.51% | 4.07% |
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 16.86% | 11.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBT and GXPT is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.75 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBT vs. GXPT — Risk / Return Rank
ROBT
GXPT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROBT vs. GXPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF (GXPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBT vs. GXPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than GXPT's maximum drawdown of -18.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and GXPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.47% | -18.74% | -25.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.93% | -8.72% | -2.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.91% | -5.04% | -10.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | — | — |
Volatility
ROBT vs. GXPT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBT | GXPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.33% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.76% | 22.91% | +1.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.49% | 22.91% | +2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.59% | 22.91% | +2.68% |
ROBT vs. GXPT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBT vs. GXPT - Dividend Comparison
ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GXPT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPT Global X PureCap MSCI Information Technology ETF | 0.12% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBT and GXPT have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.
GXPT has the higher dividend yield at 0.12%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while GXPT tracks MSCI USA Information Technology PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.15% for GXPT.
Find the right allocation for ROBT and GXPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer