PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBT vs. GINN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBT vs. GINN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBT achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than GINN's 5.00% return.


ROBT

1D
-2.40%
1M
-3.90%
YTD
3.51%
6M
1.75%
1Y
17.15%
3Y*
6.95%
5Y*
-0.08%
10Y*

GINN

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.95%
YTD
5.00%
6M
3.65%
1Y
20.17%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
5.45%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBT vs. GINN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
3.51%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%18.48%
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
5.00%20.25%18.71%29.94%-32.40%10.39%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBT and GINN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2020

0.93

The correlation between ROBT and GINN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBT vs. GINN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBT
GINN

Technology

58.6%
32.6%

Industrials

20.1%
4.7%

Healthcare

6.9%
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.4%
12.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
10.7%

Financial Services

1.5%
12.4%

Energy

1.3%
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
1.8%

Basic Materials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

0.6%

Utilities

-

1.7%

Technology

ROBT
58.6%
GINN
32.6%

Industrials

ROBT
20.1%
GINN
4.7%

Healthcare

ROBT
6.9%
GINN
20.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ROBT
6.4%
GINN
12.7%

Communication Services

ROBT
3.8%
GINN
10.7%

Financial Services

ROBT
1.5%
GINN
12.4%

Energy

ROBT
1.3%
GINN
1.7%

Consumer Defensive

ROBT
1.3%
GINN
1.8%

Basic Materials

ROBT

-

GINN
0.1%

Real Estate

ROBT

-

GINN
0.6%

Utilities

ROBT

-

GINN
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBT vs. GINN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

GINN
GINN Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GINN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GINN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
GINN Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GINN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GINN Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBT vs. GINN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) and Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBTGINNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.22

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

1.54

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

5.39

-3.18

ROBT vs. GINN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the GINN Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBT and GINN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBT vs. GINN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBT drawdown since its inception was -44.47%, which is greater than GINN's maximum drawdown of -41.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBT and GINN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBTGINNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.47%

-41.25%

-3.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.66%

-13.18%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.68%

-22.25%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.26%

-41.25%

-2.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.93%

-4.93%

-6.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.91%

-13.28%

-2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.75%

3.75%

+4.00%

Volatility

ROBT vs. GINN - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a higher volatility of 10.81% compared to Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF (GINN) at 5.81%. This indicates that ROBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GINN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBTGINNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.81%

5.81%

+5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.33%

12.92%

+6.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.76%

16.57%

+8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.49%

21.44%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

21.07%

+4.52%

ROBT vs. GINN - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBT has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GINN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBT vs. GINN - Dividend Comparison

ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GINN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
GINN
Goldman Sachs ETF Trust Goldman Sachs Innovate Equity ETF
1.20%1.26%1.26%1.01%0.69%0.67%0.07%0.00%0.00%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ROBT and GINN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ROBT has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to GINN (5.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBT dropped -44.47% vs GINN's -41.25%.

On 5-year performance, GINN leads with 5.45% vs -0.08% for ROBT. On fees, GINN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, GINN has been the lower-risk option at 5.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GINN has performed better with a 5.45% return vs -0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GINN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.

GINN has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index, while GINN tracks Solactive Innovative Global Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for ROBT and 0.50% for GINN.

GINN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBT and GINN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer