ROBO vs. PAVE
ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and PAVE (Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while PAVE is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO returned 6.67%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for PAVE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for PAVE.
Performance
ROBO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 22.54% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 6M
- 24.69%
- 1Y
- 53.50%
- 3Y*
- 13.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
PAVE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 7.37%
- YTD
- 22.54%
- 6M
- 21.41%
- 1Y
- 40.83%
- 3Y*
- 25.63%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 24.08% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -20.92% | 31.29% |
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 22.54% | 19.36% | 17.92% | 31.01% | -7.17% | 36.42% | 19.72% | 33.26% | -19.15% | 13.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and PAVE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between ROBO and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ROBO vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ROBO
PAVE
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Industrials
ROBO
PAVE
Technology
ROBO
PAVE
Healthcare
ROBO
PAVE
-
Consumer Cyclical
ROBO
PAVE
-
Financial Services
ROBO
PAVE
-
Communication Services
ROBO
PAVE
-
Consumer Defensive
ROBO
PAVE
Basic Materials
ROBO
-
PAVE
Energy
ROBO
-
PAVE
Real Estate
ROBO
-
PAVE
-
Utilities
ROBO
-
PAVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
PAVE
ROBO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 3.41 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.31 | 12.43 | -1.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and PAVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -44.08% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -11.91% | -5.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.92% | -26.23% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | -26.23% | -17.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.80% | 0.00% | -4.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.91% | -6.22% | -6.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.59% | 3.27% | +1.32% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.43%. This indicates that ROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | PAVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.88% | 6.43% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.09% | 15.79% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.67% | 19.44% | +5.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.98% | 21.65% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 24.39% | -1.07% |
ROBO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than PAVE's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PAVE Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF | 0.75% | 0.92% | 0.54% | 0.68% | 0.84% | 0.48% | 0.44% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBO has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to PAVE (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs PAVE's -44.08%.
On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 19.69% vs 6.67% for ROBO. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 19.69% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.
PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.34% for ROBO.
ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.47% for PAVE.
ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ROBO and PAVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer