PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROBO vs. PAVE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROBO vs. PAVE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly higher than PAVE's 22.54% return.


ROBO

1D
2.48%
1M
0.89%
YTD
24.08%
6M
24.69%
1Y
53.50%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
13.24%

PAVE

1D
1.00%
1M
7.37%
YTD
22.54%
6M
21.41%
1Y
40.83%
3Y*
25.63%
5Y*
19.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. PAVE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
24.08%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-20.92%31.29%
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
22.54%19.36%17.92%31.01%-7.17%36.42%19.72%33.26%-19.15%13.41%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and PAVE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2017

0.75

The correlation between ROBO and PAVE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. PAVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROBO
PAVE

Industrials

45.3%
75.1%

Technology

43.6%
1.0%

Healthcare

4.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%

-

Financial Services

1.9%

-

Communication Services

1.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
0.3%

Basic Materials

-

20.1%

Energy

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

3.2%

Industrials

ROBO
45.3%
PAVE
75.1%

Technology

ROBO
43.6%
PAVE
1.0%

Healthcare

ROBO
4.6%
PAVE

-

Consumer Cyclical

ROBO
3.1%
PAVE

-

Financial Services

ROBO
1.9%
PAVE

-

Communication Services

ROBO
1.4%
PAVE

-

Consumer Defensive

ROBO
1.3%
PAVE
0.3%

Basic Materials

ROBO

-

PAVE
20.1%

Energy

ROBO

-

PAVE
0.3%

Real Estate

ROBO

-

PAVE

-

Utilities

ROBO

-

PAVE
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROBO vs. PAVE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

PAVE
PAVE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PAVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAVE Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PAVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAVE Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. PAVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROBOPAVEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

3.41

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.31

12.43

-1.11

ROBO vs. PAVE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the PAVE Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and PAVE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. PAVE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, roughly equal to the maximum PAVE drawdown of -44.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and PAVE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROBOPAVEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.65%

-44.08%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.35%

-11.91%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.92%

-26.23%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.65%

-26.23%

-17.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.80%

0.00%

-4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.91%

-6.22%

-6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

3.27%

+1.32%

Volatility

ROBO vs. PAVE - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) has a higher volatility of 10.88% compared to Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) at 6.43%. This indicates that ROBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROBOPAVEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.88%

6.43%

+4.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.09%

15.79%

+4.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.67%

19.44%

+5.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

21.65%

+2.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.32%

24.39%

-1.07%

ROBO vs. PAVE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PAVE's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROBO vs. PAVE - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than PAVE's 0.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PAVE
Global X US Infrastructure Development ETF
0.75%0.92%0.54%0.68%0.84%0.48%0.44%0.67%0.78%0.30%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.34%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROBO and PAVE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROBO has higher volatility (10.88%) compared to PAVE (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs PAVE's -44.08%.

On 5-year performance, PAVE leads with 19.69% vs 6.67% for ROBO. On fees, PAVE is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, PAVE has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PAVE has performed better with a 19.69% return vs 6.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PAVE is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

PAVE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.34% for ROBO.

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while PAVE is Industrials Equities. ROBO tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while PAVE tracks INDXX U.S. Infrastructure Development Index. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.47% for PAVE.

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROBO and PAVE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer