ROBO vs. NUKZ
Compare and contrast key facts about ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ).
ROBO and NUKZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ROBO is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. It was launched on Oct 22, 2013. NUKZ is a passively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts that tracks the performance of the Range Nuclear Renaissance Index. It was launched on Jan 23, 2024. Both ROBO and NUKZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | -1.27% | 23.71% | 1.19% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 3.57% | 56.57% | 62.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a -1.27% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 3.57% return.
ROBO
- 1D
- 4.04%
- 1M
- -12.73%
- YTD
- -1.27%
- 6M
- 4.82%
- 1Y
- 33.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 1.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
NUKZ
- 1D
- 3.64%
- 1M
- -10.35%
- YTD
- 3.57%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- 1Y
- 74.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NUKZ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ROBO vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank
ROBO
NUKZ
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ROBO | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.29 | 2.35 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 3.02 | -1.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.38 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 4.34 | -2.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.94 | 11.46 | -4.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ROBO | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.29 | 2.35 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 1.73 | -1.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBO and NUKZ is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison
ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than NUKZ's 0.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.43% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
NUKZ Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF | 0.88% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and NUKZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBO | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.65% | -33.03% | -10.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.35% | -16.51% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.01% | -11.55% | -2.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.08% | -6.09% | -6.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.53% | 6.25% | -1.72% |
Volatility
ROBO vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) have volatilities of 10.09% and 10.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ROBO | NUKZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.09% | 10.20% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.13% | 21.54% | -4.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.06% | 31.75% | -5.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.32% | 32.60% | -9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.94% | 32.60% | -9.66% |