ROBO vs. AMOM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) and AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBO is a Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index, while AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. ROBO is passively managed, while AMOM is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ROBO returned 5.19%/yr vs 11.70%/yr for AMOM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ROBO charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AMOM.

Performance

ROBO vs. AMOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBO achieves a 19.46% return, which is significantly lower than AMOM's 26.78% return.

ROBO

• 1D: -4.44%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: 19.46%
• 6M: 18.99%
• 1Y: 46.62%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: 5.19%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

AMOM

• 1D: -4.33%
• 1M: 5.97%
• YTD: 26.78%
• 6M: 24.27%
• 1Y: 40.35%
• 3Y*: 26.54%
• 5Y*: 11.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBO vs. AMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	19.46%	23.71%	-1.28%	23.74%	-33.92%	15.34%	45.26%	14.03%
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	26.78%	7.69%	35.79%	27.06%	-26.29%	13.08%	53.81%	9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBO and AMOM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.75
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019	0.74

The correlation between ROBO and AMOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROBO vs. AMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROBO	AMOM
Industrials	45.3%	21.9%
Technology	43.6%	50.2%
Healthcare	4.6%	7.7%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	3.0%
Financial Services	1.9%	6.2%
Communication Services	1.4%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	5.0%
Basic Materials	-	4.6%
Energy	-	11.8%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Utilities	-	1.1%

Return for Risk

ROBO vs. AMOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBO

ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 56
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 53
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 59

AMOM

AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 55
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 49
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBO vs. AMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBO	AMOM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	1.67	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.47	2.21	+0.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.30	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.09	-0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.10	10.70	-0.61

ROBO vs. AMOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBO Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the AMOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBO and AMOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBO vs. AMOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBO drawdown since its inception was -43.65%, which is greater than AMOM's maximum drawdown of -39.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBO and AMOM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBO	AMOM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.65%	-39.68%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.35%	-13.10%	-4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.92%	-30.26%	+2.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.65%	-39.68%	-3.97%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.65%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.35%	-4.33%	-4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.90%	-10.75%	-2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.63%	3.78%	+0.85%

Volatility

ROBO vs. AMOM - Volatility Comparison

ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) and QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) have volatilities of 11.64% and 12.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBO	AMOM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.64%	12.24%	-0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.52%	19.66%	+0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.07%	24.29%	+0.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.06%	24.26%	-0.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.31%	25.22%	-1.91%

ROBO vs. AMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than AMOM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBO vs. AMOM - Dividend Comparison

ROBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, more than AMOM's 0.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF	0.07%	0.09%	0.00%	0.47%	0.72%	0.74%	24.31%	5.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF	0.35%	0.42%	0.55%	0.05%	0.00%	0.18%	0.20%	0.37%	0.37%	0.02%	0.19%	0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBO and AMOM in my portfolio?

ROBO and AMOM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBO or AMOM?

AMOM has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to ROBO (11.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBO dropped -43.65% vs AMOM's -39.68%.

Which ETF is better, ROBO or AMOM?

On 5-year performance, AMOM leads with 11.70% vs 5.19% for ROBO. On fees, AMOM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, ROBO has been the lower-risk option at 11.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBO or AMOM?

Over the 5-year period, AMOM has performed better with a 11.70% return vs 5.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBO or AMOM?

AMOM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for ROBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBO or AMOM?

ROBO has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.07% for AMOM.

What is the main difference between ROBO and AMOM?

ROBO is categorized as Robotics, while AMOM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for ROBO and 0.75% for AMOM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.