ROBN vs. NVDQ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and NVDQ (T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROBN is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex, while NVDQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by T-Rex. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ROBN returned -29.71% vs -55.07% for NVDQ. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.05% expense ratio.

Performance

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -27.36% return, which is significantly higher than NVDQ's -38.39% return.

ROBN

• 1D: 4.19%
• 1M: 32.51%
• 6M: -34.60%
• YTD: -27.36%
• 1Y: -29.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NVDQ

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -3.36%
• 6M: -40.41%
• YTD: -38.39%
• 1Y: -55.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	-27.36%	124.78%
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	-38.39%	-74.55%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and NVDQ is -0.46, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	-0.51

The correlation between ROBN and NVDQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.51 to -0.46 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ROBN vs. NVDQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN

ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 10
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 7

NVDQ

NVDQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
NVDQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3
NVDQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
NVDQ Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBN	NVDQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	-0.78	+0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.65	-1.05	+1.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.88	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.34	-0.90	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.51	-1.63	+1.12

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROBN Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is higher than the NVDQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROBN and NVDQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, smaller than the maximum NVDQ drawdown of -99.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and NVDQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBN	NVDQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.84%	-99.45%	+12.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.84%	-61.65%	-25.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.08%	-99.38%	+33.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.38%	-88.53%	+43.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	58.38%	33.77%	+24.61%

Volatility

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Volatility Comparison

T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) has a higher volatility of 37.14% compared to T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDQ) at 22.84%. This indicates that ROBN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROBN	NVDQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	37.14%	22.84%	+14.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	105.20%	55.75%	+49.45%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	138.91%	71.32%	+67.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	150.94%	94.97%	+55.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	150.94%	94.97%	+55.97%

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ROBN and NVDQ have an expense ratio of 1.05%.

Dividends

ROBN vs. NVDQ - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.17%, more than NVDQ's 0.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
NVDQ T-Rex 2X Inverse NVIDIA Daily Target ETF	0.42%	0.26%	4.59%	11.60%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	6.17%	4.48%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBN and NVDQ in my portfolio?

ROBN and NVDQ have a correlation of -0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ROBN or NVDQ?

ROBN has higher volatility (37.14%) compared to NVDQ (22.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROBN dropped -86.84% vs NVDQ's -99.45%.

Which ETF is better, ROBN or NVDQ?

On 1-year performance, ROBN leads with -29.71% vs -55.07% for NVDQ. Both ETFs have the same 1.05% expense ratio. On volatility, NVDQ has been the lower-risk option at 22.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROBN or NVDQ?

Over the 1-year period, ROBN has performed better with a -29.71% return vs -55.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBN or NVDQ?

ROBN and NVDQ have the same expense ratio: 1.05% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBN or NVDQ?

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 6.17%, compared with 0.42% for NVDQ.

What is the main difference between ROBN and NVDQ?

ROBN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while NVDQ is Inverse Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROBN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.