ROBN vs. LULG
ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and LULG (Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for LULG.
Performance
ROBN vs. LULG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -54.45% return, which is significantly higher than LULG's -71.45% return.
ROBN
- 1D
- 6.89%
- 1M
- -34.81%
- 6M
- -20.09%
- YTD
- -54.45%
- 1Y
- -60.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.58%
LULG
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- 5.51%
- 6M
- -57.00%
- YTD
- -71.45%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $619.27K | $647.46K | $1.12M | |
| $16.08M | $23.06M | $32.84M |
ROBN vs. LULG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | -54.45% | -39.88% |
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | -71.45% | 55.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between ROBN and LULG is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ROBN vs. LULG — Risk / Return Rank
ROBN
LULG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ROBN vs. LULG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF (LULG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ROBN | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.99 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ROBN vs. LULG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than LULG's maximum drawdown of -79.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and LULG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ROBN | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.84% | -79.88% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -86.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.73% | -73.56% | -5.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.55% | -42.79% | -3.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 61.08% | — | — |
Volatility
ROBN vs. LULG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ROBN | LULG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 35.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 106.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 141.16% | 85.79% | +55.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 150.61% | 85.79% | +64.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 150.61% | 85.79% | +64.82% |
ROBN vs. LULG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than LULG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ROBN vs. LULG - Dividend Comparison
ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.84%, while LULG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LULG Leverage Shares 2X Long LULU Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | 9.84% | 4.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ROBN and LULG have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LULG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LULG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.
ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 9.84%, compared with 0.00% for LULG.
They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.75% for LULG.
Find the right allocation for ROBN and LULG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer