ROBN vs. COTG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

ROBN (T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF) and COTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.13, they often move in opposite directions. ROBN charges 1.05%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for COTG.

Performance

ROBN vs. COTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROBN achieves a -37.23% return, which is significantly lower than COTG's 14.10% return.

ROBN

• 1D: -4.80%
• 1M: 92.55%
• YTD: -37.23%
• 6M: -46.95%
• 1Y: -5.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COTG

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -15.48%
• YTD: 14.10%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROBN vs. COTG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	-37.23%	-25.47%
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	14.10%	-22.61%

Correlation

The correlation between ROBN and COTG is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	-0.13

Return for Risk

ROBN vs. COTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROBN

ROBN Risk / Return Rank: 12
ROBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
ROBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
ROBN Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ROBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ROBN Martin Ratio Rank: 8

COTG

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROBN vs. COTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF (ROBN) and Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF (COTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROBN	COTG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.04	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.11	—	—

Drawdowns

ROBN vs. COTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROBN drawdown since its inception was -86.84%, which is greater than COTG's maximum drawdown of -25.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROBN and COTG.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROBN	COTG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-86.84%	-25.69%	-61.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-86.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-70.69%	-25.58%	-45.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-9.64%	-34.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	55.66%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ROBN	COTG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	46.05%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	102.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.33%	40.09%	+100.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	152.09%	40.09%	+112.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	152.09%	40.09%	+112.00%

ROBN vs. COTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROBN has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than COTG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROBN vs. COTG - Dividend Comparison

ROBN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.14%, while COTG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
COTG Leverage Shares 2X Long COST Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
ROBN T-REX 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF	7.14%	4.48%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROBN and COTG in my portfolio?

ROBN and COTG have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ROBN or COTG?

On fees, COTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROBN or COTG?

COTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for ROBN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROBN or COTG?

ROBN has the higher dividend yield at 7.14%, compared with 0.00% for COTG.

What is the main difference between ROBN and COTG?

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.05% for ROBN and 0.75% for COTG.