PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROAM vs. DBEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROAM vs. DBEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly lower than DBEM's 27.92% return. Over the past 10 years, ROAM has underperformed DBEM with an annualized return of 9.33%, while DBEM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.69% annualized return.


ROAM

1D
-3.55%
1M
3.25%
YTD
24.58%
6M
25.40%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
9.33%

DBEM

1D
-5.21%
1M
2.97%
YTD
27.92%
6M
28.44%
1Y
54.61%
3Y*
24.78%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROAM vs. DBEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
24.58%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%9.32%2.24%8.89%-12.24%27.69%
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
27.92%30.42%10.61%10.53%-17.00%-2.26%18.12%16.77%-10.81%27.10%

Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and DBEM is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ROAM and DBEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROAM vs. DBEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROAM
DBEM

Technology

40.0%
43.6%

Financial Services

19.9%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
8.4%

Communication Services

6.0%
6.1%

Industrials

5.6%
6.7%

Energy

4.8%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
2.5%

Basic Materials

3.8%
6.0%

Healthcare

3.1%
2.5%

Utilities

2.2%
1.8%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.0%

Technology

ROAM
40.0%
DBEM
43.6%

Financial Services

ROAM
19.9%
DBEM
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ROAM
7.4%
DBEM
8.4%

Communication Services

ROAM
6.0%
DBEM
6.1%

Industrials

ROAM
5.6%
DBEM
6.7%

Energy

ROAM
4.8%
DBEM
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

ROAM
4.7%
DBEM
2.5%

Basic Materials

ROAM
3.8%
DBEM
6.0%

Healthcare

ROAM
3.1%
DBEM
2.5%

Utilities

ROAM
2.2%
DBEM
1.8%

Real Estate

ROAM
1.3%
DBEM
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROAM vs. DBEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DBEM
DBEM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DBEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DBEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBEM Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAM vs. DBEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROAMDBEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.49

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

5.22

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.16

19.15

-2.99

ROAM vs. DBEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the DBEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAM and DBEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. DBEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than DBEM's maximum drawdown of -33.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and DBEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROAMDBEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-33.51%

-11.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.51%

+0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-15.12%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-30.48%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

-33.51%

-11.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-5.21%

+1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-11.66%

+0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.86%

-0.08%

Volatility

ROAM vs. DBEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) is 9.09%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF (DBEM) has a volatility of 11.58%. This indicates that ROAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROAMDBEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

11.58%

-2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

18.66%

-3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

20.69%

-4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

17.70%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

17.39%

+0.56%

ROAM vs. DBEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than DBEM's 0.66% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROAM vs. DBEM - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than DBEM's 2.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBEM
Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets Hedged Equity ETF
2.06%1.84%2.48%2.55%2.65%1.77%1.74%2.59%2.85%1.51%1.59%3.49%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.55%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROAM and DBEM have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBEM has higher volatility (11.58%) compared to ROAM (9.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAM dropped -45.47% vs DBEM's -33.51%.

On 10-year performance, DBEM leads with 10.69% vs 9.33% for ROAM. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, ROAM has been the lower-risk option at 9.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DBEM has performed better with a 10.69% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for DBEM.

ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.06% for DBEM.

ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while DBEM tracks MSCI EM US Dollar Hedged Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for ROAM and 0.66% for DBEM.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROAM and DBEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer