PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROAM vs. EDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROAM vs. EDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly higher than EDIV's 5.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROAM having a 9.33% annualized return and EDIV not far behind at 9.21%.


ROAM

1D
-3.55%
1M
3.25%
YTD
24.58%
6M
25.40%
1Y
44.77%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
9.33%

EDIV

1D
-1.48%
1M
0.10%
YTD
5.93%
6M
5.72%
1Y
14.10%
3Y*
17.91%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROAM vs. EDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
24.58%32.08%6.21%21.28%-14.78%9.32%2.24%8.89%-12.24%27.69%
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
5.93%16.45%12.75%41.91%-15.31%11.21%-9.95%11.80%-6.16%28.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and EDIV is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015

0.81

The correlation between ROAM and EDIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROAM vs. EDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROAM
EDIV

Technology

40.0%
6.8%

Financial Services

19.9%
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

7.4%
7.6%

Communication Services

6.0%
5.2%

Industrials

5.6%
6.4%

Energy

4.8%
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
9.3%

Basic Materials

3.8%
0.9%

Healthcare

3.1%
0.6%

Utilities

2.2%
1.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Technology

ROAM
40.0%
EDIV
6.8%

Financial Services

ROAM
19.9%
EDIV
16.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ROAM
7.4%
EDIV
7.6%

Communication Services

ROAM
6.0%
EDIV
5.2%

Industrials

ROAM
5.6%
EDIV
6.4%

Energy

ROAM
4.8%
EDIV
3.7%

Consumer Defensive

ROAM
4.7%
EDIV
9.3%

Basic Materials

ROAM
3.8%
EDIV
0.9%

Healthcare

ROAM
3.1%
EDIV
0.6%

Utilities

ROAM
2.2%
EDIV
1.6%

Real Estate

ROAM
1.3%
EDIV
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROAM vs. EDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAM
ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIV
EDIV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
EDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAM vs. EDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROAMEDIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.21

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.54

1.37

+3.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.16

4.08

+12.07

ROAM vs. EDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the EDIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAM and EDIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. EDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, smaller than the maximum EDIV drawdown of -53.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and EDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROAMEDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-53.36%

+7.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.36%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.79%

-13.84%

-2.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-28.32%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.47%

-40.76%

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.55%

-4.51%

+0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.09%

-19.31%

+8.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

3.46%

-0.68%

Volatility

ROAM vs. EDIV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) has a higher volatility of 9.09% compared to SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF (EDIV) at 4.81%. This indicates that ROAM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROAMEDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.09%

4.81%

+4.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.83%

10.71%

+4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.66%

12.67%

+3.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.60%

13.91%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.95%

17.38%

+0.57%

ROAM vs. EDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than EDIV's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROAM vs. EDIV - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than EDIV's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIV
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets Dividend ETF
4.28%4.69%3.94%4.26%4.94%3.84%3.52%3.83%3.41%2.99%4.94%5.33%
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
2.55%3.17%4.15%5.40%5.23%4.22%3.04%3.55%2.54%1.84%1.89%2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROAM and EDIV have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ROAM has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to EDIV (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAM dropped -45.47% vs EDIV's -53.36%.

On 10-year performance, ROAM leads with 9.33% vs 9.21% for EDIV. On fees, ROAM is cheaper at 0.44% per year. On volatility, EDIV has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 9.33% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ROAM is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EDIV.

EDIV has the higher dividend yield at 4.28%, compared with 2.55% for ROAM.

ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EDIV tracks S&P Emerging Markets Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for ROAM and 0.49% for EDIV.

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROAM and EDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer