PortfoliosLab logo
ROAM vs. EEMV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and EEMV is -0.60. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

ROAM vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

ROAM:

12.52%

EEMV:

10.99%

Max Drawdown

ROAM:

-1.27%

EEMV:

-1.69%

Current Drawdown

ROAM:

-0.23%

EEMV:

-0.97%

Returns By Period


ROAM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

EEMV

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


ROAM vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ROAM vs. EEMV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ROAM is 4949
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ROAM is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ROAM is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ROAM is 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ROAM is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ROAM is 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

EEMV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of EEMV is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of EEMV is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of EEMV is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ROAM vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

ROAM vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, more than EEMV's 3.36% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
ROAM
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF
3.89%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEMV
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF
3.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -1.27%, smaller than the maximum EEMV drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and EEMV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

ROAM vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...