ROAM vs. EEMV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ROAM (Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF) and EEMV (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ROAM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EEMV is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ROAM returned 9.33%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for EEMV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ROAM charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EEMV.

Performance

ROAM vs. EEMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROAM achieves a 24.58% return, which is significantly higher than EEMV's 16.76% return. Over the past 10 years, ROAM has outperformed EEMV with an annualized return of 9.33%, while EEMV has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.

ROAM

• 1D: -3.55%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 24.58%
• 6M: 25.40%
• 1Y: 44.77%
• 3Y*: 25.04%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: 9.33%

EEMV

• 1D: -3.65%
• 1M: 3.07%
• YTD: 16.76%
• 6M: 16.47%
• 1Y: 24.00%
• 3Y*: 14.12%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: 6.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ROAM vs. EEMV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	24.58%	32.08%	6.21%	21.28%	-14.78%	9.32%	2.24%	8.89%	-12.24%	27.69%
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	16.76%	13.45%	7.98%	7.75%	-13.94%	5.05%	6.90%	7.83%	-5.81%	27.28%

Correlation

The correlation between ROAM and EEMV is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2015	0.84

The correlation between ROAM and EEMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROAM vs. EEMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ROAM	EEMV
Technology	40.0%	36.5%
Financial Services	19.9%	18.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.4%	6.2%
Communication Services	6.0%	10.1%
Industrials	5.6%	6.6%
Energy	4.8%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	5.6%
Basic Materials	3.8%	2.9%
Healthcare	3.1%	5.4%
Utilities	2.2%	4.4%
Real Estate	1.3%	0.6%

Return for Risk

ROAM vs. EEMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ROAM

ROAM Risk / Return Rank: 86
ROAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
ROAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ROAM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ROAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
ROAM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

EEMV

EEMV Risk / Return Rank: 52
EEMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
EEMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
EEMV Omega Ratio Rank: 55
EEMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
EEMV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ROAM vs. EEMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ROAM	EEMV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	1.58	+1.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.41	2.19	+1.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.50	1.33	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.54	2.61	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.16	9.38	+6.78

ROAM vs. EEMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROAM Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the EEMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROAM and EEMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ROAM vs. EEMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROAM drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than EEMV's maximum drawdown of -31.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROAM and EEMV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ROAM	EEMV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.47%	-31.56%	-13.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.92%	-9.22%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.79%	-12.47%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.07%	-21.90%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.47%	-31.56%	-13.91%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-3.65%	+0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.09%	-7.95%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	2.57%	+0.21%

Volatility

ROAM vs. EEMV - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF (ROAM) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF (EEMV) have volatilities of 9.09% and 8.95%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ROAM	EEMV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.09%	8.95%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.83%	14.17%	+0.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.66%	15.25%	+1.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	12.36%	+3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.95%	13.97%	+3.98%

ROAM vs. EEMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROAM has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMV's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

ROAM vs. EEMV - Dividend Comparison

ROAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than EEMV's 2.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMV iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Min Vol Factor ETF	2.19%	2.65%	3.50%	2.75%	1.93%	2.14%	2.45%	2.63%	2.46%	2.34%	2.79%	2.55%
ROAM Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets ETF	2.55%	3.17%	4.15%	5.40%	5.23%	4.22%	3.04%	3.55%	2.54%	1.84%	1.89%	2.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ROAM and EEMV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, ROAM and EEMV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, ROAM or EEMV?

ROAM has higher volatility (9.09%) compared to EEMV (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROAM dropped -45.47% vs EEMV's -31.56%.

Which ETF is better, ROAM or EEMV?

On 10-year performance, ROAM leads with 9.33% vs 6.81% for EEMV. On fees, EEMV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, EEMV has been the lower-risk option at 8.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ROAM or EEMV?

Over the 10-year period, ROAM has performed better with a 9.33% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ROAM or EEMV?

EEMV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for ROAM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ROAM or EEMV?

ROAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.55%, compared with 2.19% for EEMV.

What is the main difference between ROAM and EEMV?

ROAM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while EEMV is Asia Pacific Equities. ROAM tracks Hartford Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity Index, while EEMV tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for ROAM and 0.25% for EEMV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ROAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.