PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNEM vs. PIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNEM vs. PIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than PIE's 39.11% return.


RNEM

1D
-1.34%
1M
-1.29%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
-0.99%
1Y
3.68%
3Y*
7.58%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*

PIE

1D
-0.95%
1M
5.39%
YTD
39.11%
6M
38.18%
1Y
70.48%
3Y*
23.39%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
10.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNEM vs. PIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
-1.51%15.58%-1.47%23.43%-8.75%6.16%-8.16%12.76%-9.34%11.97%
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
39.11%25.98%-0.27%13.71%-28.77%14.30%21.23%26.11%-22.04%20.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RNEM and PIE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2017

0.62

The correlation between RNEM and PIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

RNEM vs. PIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNEM
PIE

Financial Services

34.7%
14.4%

Basic Materials

13.7%
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
1.3%

Communication Services

9.1%
1.4%

Energy

7.6%
5.4%

Technology

6.0%
47.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
0.4%

Healthcare

4.6%
5.1%

Industrials

4.1%
16.8%

Utilities

3.7%
1.3%

Real Estate

0.8%
3.6%

Financial Services

RNEM
34.7%
PIE
14.4%

Basic Materials

RNEM
13.7%
PIE
3.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RNEM
10.1%
PIE
1.3%

Communication Services

RNEM
9.1%
PIE
1.4%

Energy

RNEM
7.6%
PIE
5.4%

Technology

RNEM
6.0%
PIE
47.0%

Consumer Defensive

RNEM
5.9%
PIE
0.4%

Healthcare

RNEM
4.6%
PIE
5.1%

Industrials

RNEM
4.1%
PIE
16.8%

Utilities

RNEM
3.7%
PIE
1.3%

Real Estate

RNEM
0.8%
PIE
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNEM vs. PIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNEM
RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

PIE
PIE Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
PIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIE Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNEM vs. PIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNEMPIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.55

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

7.18

-6.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.80

23.52

-22.72

RNEM vs. PIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is lower than the PIE Sharpe Ratio of 3.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNEM and PIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNEMPIEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

3.24

-2.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.35

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.12

+0.11

Drawdowns

RNEM vs. PIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum PIE drawdown of -72.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and PIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNEMPIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-72.98%

+34.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-9.87%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-28.69%

+15.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-40.32%

+18.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.46%

-1.17%

-6.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.30%

-26.08%

+16.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.59%

3.01%

+1.58%

Volatility

RNEM vs. PIE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) is 4.23%, while Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (PIE) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that RNEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNEMPIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.23%

9.00%

-4.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

17.77%

-7.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.31%

21.91%

-8.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.40%

20.23%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.22%

21.35%

-4.13%

RNEM vs. PIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PIE's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNEM vs. PIE - Dividend Comparison

RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, more than PIE's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIE
Invesco DWA Emerging Markets Momentum ETF
1.70%2.28%2.33%2.59%3.45%1.28%1.32%2.29%3.32%1.63%1.48%0.80%
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
2.79%2.75%3.45%1.63%2.99%3.20%3.01%2.85%2.85%2.28%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNEM and PIE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PIE has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to RNEM (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNEM dropped -38.38% vs PIE's -72.98%.

On 5-year performance, PIE leads with 7.01% vs 3.88% for RNEM. On fees, RNEM is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PIE has performed better with a 7.01% return vs 3.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RNEM is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for PIE.

RNEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 1.70% for PIE.

RNEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while PIE is Momentum. RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while PIE tracks Dorsey Wright Emerging Markets Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.90% for PIE.

PIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNEM and PIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer