RNEM vs. SCHD
RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RNEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RNEM returned 4.54%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for SCHD. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RNEM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
RNEM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a -0.01% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 17.72% return.
RNEM
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 4.82%
- 3Y*
- 7.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 17.25%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- 12.72%
RNEM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | -0.01% | 15.58% | -1.47% | 23.43% | -8.75% | 6.16% | -8.16% | 12.76% | -9.34% | 11.97% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 17.72% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between RNEM and SCHD is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.43 |
The correlation between RNEM and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RNEM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RNEM
SCHD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
RNEM
SCHD
Basic Materials
RNEM
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
RNEM
SCHD
Communication Services
RNEM
SCHD
Energy
RNEM
SCHD
Technology
RNEM
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
RNEM
SCHD
Healthcare
RNEM
SCHD
Industrials
RNEM
SCHD
Utilities
RNEM
SCHD
Real Estate
RNEM
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RNEM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
RNEM
SCHD
RNEM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RNEM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.40 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 5.35 | -4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 12.94 | -11.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RNEM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNEM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.38% | -33.37% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -4.61% | -6.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.09% | -16.13% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | -16.85% | -4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.06% | -2.47% | -3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.28% | -3.31% | -5.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.83% | 1.90% | +2.93% |
Volatility
RNEM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) has a higher volatility of 4.04% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.58%. This indicates that RNEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RNEM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 3.58% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.80% | 7.73% | +3.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.64% | 11.07% | +2.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.47% | 14.36% | +0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 16.71% | +0.50% |
RNEM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
RNEM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than SCHD's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | 2.75% | 2.75% | 3.45% | 1.63% | 2.99% | 3.20% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 2.85% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.30% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RNEM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RNEM has higher volatility (4.04%) compared to SCHD (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNEM dropped -38.38% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 8.71% vs 4.54% for RNEM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 8.71% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.30%, compared with 2.75% for RNEM.
RNEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RNEM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer