PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNEM vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNEM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a 3.95% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return.


RNEM

1D
-0.17%
1M
4.02%
6M
1.40%
YTD
3.95%
1Y
9.33%
3Y*
6.73%
5Y*
5.70%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.46%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$35.85K$33.48K$54.35K
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

RNEM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
3.95%15.58%-1.47%23.43%-8.75%6.16%-8.16%12.76%-9.34%11.97%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%14.09%

Correlation

The correlation between RNEM and SCHD is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.43

The correlation between RNEM and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNEM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNEM
SCHD

Financial Services

36.0%
9.9%

Basic Materials

13.8%
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
7.7%

Communication Services

8.5%
6.2%

Energy

6.5%
14.1%

Technology

6.5%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.9%
20.6%

Healthcare

4.5%
20.8%

Industrials

4.1%
7.8%

Utilities

3.4%
0.1%

Real Estate

0.8%

-

Financial Services

RNEM
36.0%
SCHD
9.9%

Basic Materials

RNEM
13.8%
SCHD
1.2%

Consumer Cyclical

RNEM
10.0%
SCHD
7.7%

Communication Services

RNEM
8.5%
SCHD
6.2%

Energy

RNEM
6.5%
SCHD
14.1%

Technology

RNEM
6.5%
SCHD
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

RNEM
5.9%
SCHD
20.6%

Healthcare

RNEM
4.5%
SCHD
20.8%

Industrials

RNEM
4.1%
SCHD
7.8%

Utilities

RNEM
3.4%
SCHD
0.1%

Real Estate

RNEM
0.8%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNEM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNEM
RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNEM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNEMSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.51

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

6.74

-5.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.31

17.01

-14.70

RNEM vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNEM Sharpe Ratio is 0.75, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNEM and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNEM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNEMSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.38%

-33.37%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.71%

-4.61%

-6.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.09%

-16.13%

+3.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.41%

-16.85%

-4.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.33%

-1.24%

-1.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-3.30%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

1.82%

+2.22%

Volatility

RNEM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) is 3.15%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that RNEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNEMSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.15%

4.11%

-0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.89%

8.11%

+2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

11.13%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.47%

14.39%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.14%

16.72%

+0.42%

RNEM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNEM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.28%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RNEM
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF
2.28%2.75%3.45%1.63%2.99%3.20%3.01%2.85%2.85%2.28%0.00%0.00%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNEM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to RNEM (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNEM dropped -38.38% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 5-year performance, SCHD leads with 9.54% vs 5.70% for RNEM. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 9.54% return vs 5.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.28% for RNEM.

RNEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for RNEM and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNEM and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer