RNEM vs. SFENX
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX).
RNEM is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2017. SFENX is managed by Charles Schwab. It was launched on Jan 30, 2008.
Performance
RNEM vs. SFENX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RNEM vs. SFENX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | -2.20% | 15.58% | -1.47% | 23.43% | -8.75% | 6.16% | -8.16% | 12.76% | -9.34% | 11.97% |
SFENX Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund | 3.00% | 29.19% | 12.31% | 14.90% | -15.50% | 13.91% | -3.01% | 19.46% | -9.96% | 14.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RNEM achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than SFENX's 3.00% return.
RNEM
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -6.94%
- YTD
- -2.20%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 8.54%
- 3Y*
- 9.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.61%
- 10Y*
- —
SFENX
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -7.59%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 6.94%
- 1Y
- 26.15%
- 3Y*
- 17.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RNEM vs. SFENX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RNEM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SFENX's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RNEM vs. SFENX — Risk / Return Rank
RNEM
SFENX
RNEM vs. SFENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) and Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RNEM | SFENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 1.69 | -1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.88 | 2.24 | -1.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.33 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.91 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | 8.30 | -6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RNEM | SFENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 1.69 | -1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.58 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.40 | -0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between RNEM and SFENX is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RNEM vs. SFENX - Dividend Comparison
RNEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than SFENX's 3.82% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF | 2.81% | 2.75% | 3.45% | 1.63% | 2.99% | 3.20% | 3.01% | 2.85% | 2.85% | 2.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SFENX Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund | 3.82% | 3.93% | 4.67% | 5.00% | 5.46% | 4.61% | 2.95% | 3.82% | 2.90% | 2.37% | 2.16% | 3.23% |
Drawdowns
RNEM vs. SFENX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RNEM drawdown since its inception was -38.38%, smaller than the maximum SFENX drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNEM and SFENX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RNEM | SFENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.38% | -47.19% | +8.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.71% | -12.50% | +1.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.41% | -29.26% | +7.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -8.82% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.38% | -13.00% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.10% | 2.87% | +1.23% |
Volatility
RNEM vs. SFENX - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) has a higher volatility of 6.79% compared to Schwab Fundamental Emerging Markets Large Company Index Fund (SFENX) at 5.97%. This indicates that RNEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RNEM | SFENX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.79% | 5.97% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.42% | 10.31% | -0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.02% | 15.42% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.38% | 15.34% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 16.98% | +0.30% |