RNDV vs. CIBR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).

RNDV and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RNDV is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index. It was launched on Jun 20, 2017. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. Both RNDV and CIBR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

RNDV vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RNDV vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF	1.04%	14.27%	11.05%	9.77%	-7.55%	28.99%	5.51%	27.34%	-7.11%	9.90%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	-12.12%	13.06%	18.21%	39.71%	-26.46%	19.67%	50.53%	28.52%	1.47%	6.45%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's -12.12% return.

RNDV

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: -5.13%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 14.94%
• 3Y*: 11.32%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: —

CIBR

• 1D: 3.11%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -12.12%
• 6M: -17.17%
• 1Y: 0.06%
• 3Y*: 14.11%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 14.52%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNDV vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CIBR's 0.60% expense ratio.

CIBR

First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF

RNDV

US Equity Dividend Select ETF

Return for Risk

RNDV vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNDV

RNDV Risk / Return Rank: 46
RNDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RNDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
RNDV Omega Ratio Rank: 45
RNDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
RNDV Martin Ratio Rank: 48

CIBR

CIBR Risk / Return Rank: 12
CIBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Omega Ratio Rank: 13
CIBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CIBR Martin Ratio Rank: 12

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNDV vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RNDV	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.81	0.00	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.23	0.17	+1.06
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.02	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.20	-0.03	+1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.66	-0.07	+4.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RNDV vs. CIBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is higher than the CIBR Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNDV and CIBR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RNDV	CIBR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81	0.00	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.36	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.51	+0.02

Correlation

The correlation between RNDV and CIBR is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

RNDV vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison

RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than CIBR's 0.65% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RNDV US Equity Dividend Select ETF	2.69%	2.70%	2.55%	3.10%	2.52%	1.95%	2.44%	2.85%	4.09%	1.10%	0.00%	0.00%
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF	0.65%	0.42%	0.29%	0.42%	0.31%	0.59%	1.10%	0.23%	0.23%	0.10%	0.77%	0.58%

Drawdowns

RNDV vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, which is greater than CIBR's maximum drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and CIBR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RNDV	CIBR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.44%	-33.89%	-3.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.46%	-21.96%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.71%	-33.89%	+14.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.23%	-19.50%	+12.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.93%	-8.66%	+3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.47%	8.02%	-4.55%

Volatility

RNDV vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) is 4.32%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that RNDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RNDV	CIBR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.32%	7.04%	-2.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.20%	16.45%	-6.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.64%	24.46%	-5.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.03%	24.21%	-8.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.95%	23.22%	-4.27%