PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNDV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNDV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 11.25% return.


RNDV

1D
-1.01%
1M
8.04%
YTD
16.69%
6M
16.73%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*

ITOT

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.01%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.12%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.09%
5Y*
12.69%
10Y*
15.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RNDV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
16.69%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-7.11%9.90%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
11.25%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RNDV and ITOT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.68

The correlation between RNDV and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNDV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNDV
ITOT

Technology

34.0%
33.8%

Healthcare

13.6%
9.0%

Financial Services

10.7%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%
10.1%

Industrials

9.4%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.7%

Energy

5.0%
3.7%

Communication Services

4.8%
10.3%

Utilities

2.6%
2.3%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.1%

Technology

RNDV
34.0%
ITOT
33.8%

Healthcare

RNDV
13.6%
ITOT
9.0%

Financial Services

RNDV
10.7%
ITOT
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RNDV
9.7%
ITOT
10.1%

Industrials

RNDV
9.4%
ITOT
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

RNDV
5.8%
ITOT
4.7%

Energy

RNDV
5.0%
ITOT
3.7%

Communication Services

RNDV
4.8%
ITOT
10.3%

Utilities

RNDV
2.6%
ITOT
2.3%

Real Estate

RNDV
2.4%
ITOT
2.4%

Basic Materials

RNDV
1.7%
ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNDV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RNDV
RNDV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RNDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNDV Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
RNDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNDV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RNDV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RNDVITOTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.34

2.32

+0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.33

3.17

+0.16

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.37

3.17

+0.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.35

14.57

-3.22

RNDV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNDV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RNDVITOTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.32

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.74

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.57

+0.04

Drawdowns

RNDV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNDVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-55.20%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.90%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-19.44%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-25.36%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-0.73%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-6.97%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.94%

+0.85%

Volatility

RNDV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) has a higher volatility of 3.82% compared to iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) at 2.99%. This indicates that RNDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNDVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.82%

2.99%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

9.13%

+0.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.58%

12.20%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.12%

17.36%

-1.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.87%

18.26%

+0.61%

RNDV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNDV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than ITOT's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.98%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
2.33%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNDV and ITOT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RNDV has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to ITOT (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNDV dropped -37.44% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.69% vs 9.28% for RNDV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ITOT has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.69% return vs 9.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNDV.

RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.98% for ITOT.

RNDV is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ITOT is Large Cap Growth Equities. RNDV tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Composite 1500 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 0.03% for ITOT.

RNDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNDV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer