PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RNDV vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RNDV vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RNDV achieves a 16.58% return, which is significantly higher than ITOT's 12.18% return.


RNDV

1D
0.85%
1M
2.20%
6M
9.84%
YTD
16.58%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
15.26%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.31%

ITOT

1D
1.46%
1M
1.37%
6M
9.88%
YTD
12.18%
1Y
23.59%
3Y*
20.38%
5Y*
12.06%
10Y*
14.61%
ALL TIME*
10.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$218.20M$235.22M$304.20M
$238.83K$213.53K$206.96K

RNDV vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
16.58%14.27%11.05%9.77%-7.55%28.99%5.51%27.34%-7.11%9.90%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
12.18%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%11.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RNDV and ITOT is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017

0.68

The correlation between RNDV and ITOT shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.78 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RNDV vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RNDV
ITOT

Technology

35.0%
36.4%

Healthcare

13.6%
9.5%

Financial Services

10.7%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
9.5%

Industrials

8.5%
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.3%

Energy

5.0%
3.1%

Communication Services

4.8%
9.1%

Utilities

2.6%
2.2%

Real Estate

2.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.9%

Technology

RNDV
35.0%
ITOT
36.4%

Healthcare

RNDV
13.6%
ITOT
9.5%

Financial Services

RNDV
10.7%
ITOT
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

RNDV
9.5%
ITOT
9.5%

Industrials

RNDV
8.5%
ITOT
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

RNDV
5.8%
ITOT
4.3%

Energy

RNDV
5.0%
ITOT
3.1%

Communication Services

RNDV
4.8%
ITOT
9.1%

Utilities

RNDV
2.6%
ITOT
2.2%

Real Estate

RNDV
2.4%
ITOT
2.3%

Basic Materials

RNDV
1.8%
ITOT
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RNDV vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RNDV
RNDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
RNDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RNDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
RNDV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RNDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
RNDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RNDV vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RNDVITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.32

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

2.66

+0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

11.42

-1.97

RNDV vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RNDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RNDV and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RNDV vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RNDV drawdown since its inception was -37.44%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RNDV and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RNDVITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-55.20%

+17.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.41%

-8.90%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.70%

-19.44%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.71%

-25.36%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

0.00%

-1.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-6.93%

+2.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

2.07%

+0.87%

Volatility

RNDV vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

US Equity Dividend Select ETF (RNDV) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) have volatilities of 3.74% and 3.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RNDVITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

3.80%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.99%

10.35%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.65%

13.11%

+0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.13%

17.48%

-1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

18.28%

+0.50%

RNDV vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RNDV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RNDV vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

RNDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, more than ITOT's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
0.99%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%
RNDV
US Equity Dividend Select ETF
2.50%2.70%2.55%3.10%2.52%1.95%2.44%2.85%4.09%1.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RNDV and ITOT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (3.80%) compared to RNDV (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RNDV dropped -37.44% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 5-year performance, ITOT leads with 12.06% vs 9.76% for RNDV. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 12.06% return vs 9.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for RNDV.

RNDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.99% for ITOT.

RNDV tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze US Large Cap Select Dividend Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for RNDV and 0.03% for ITOT.

RNDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RNDV and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer