RMQHX vs. ULPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. ULPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Nov 25, 1997.
Performance
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund | -10.31% | 25.47% | 38.03% | 45.59% | -39.16% | 59.28% | 19.12% | 62.17% | -15.02% | 42.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than ULPIX's -10.31% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed ULPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while ULPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.67% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
ULPIX
- 1D
- 5.82%
- 1M
- -10.47%
- YTD
- -10.31%
- 6M
- -7.88%
- 1Y
- 24.97%
- 3Y*
- 26.11%
- 5Y*
- 13.95%
- 10Y*
- 19.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ULPIX's 1.46% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. ULPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
ULPIX
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.71 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.21 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.17 | +0.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 5.03 | +0.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.71 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.41 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.56 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.22 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and ULPIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than ULPIX's 10.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
ULPIX ProFunds UltraBull Fund | 10.16% | 9.11% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 10.36% | 5.62% | 12.74% | 0.42% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum ULPIX drawdown of -89.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and ULPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -89.68% | +26.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -23.37% | -1.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -46.92% | -16.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -59.41% | -3.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -13.54% | -5.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -34.03% | +21.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 5.42% | +1.89% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. ULPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) at 10.64%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | ULPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 10.64% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 19.05% | +7.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 36.79% | +11.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 33.93% | +12.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 35.41% | +10.95% |