ULPIX vs. SSO

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ULPIX having a -3.60% return and SSO slightly higher at -3.54%. Over the past 10 years, ULPIX has underperformed SSO with an annualized return of 17.63%, while SSO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.68% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ULPIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than SSO's 0.90% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current ULPIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the SSO Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULPIX and SSO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

ULPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than SSO's 0.87% yield.

The maximum ULPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.35%, which is greater than SSO's maximum drawdown of -84.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULPIX and SSO.

ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and ProShares Ultra S&P 500 (SSO) have volatilities of 9.57% and 9.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.