RMQHX vs. BLPIX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RMQHX (Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H) and BLPIX (ProFunds Bull Investor Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX returned 37.46%/yr vs 12.96%/yr for BLPIX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RMQHX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for BLPIX.

Performance

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a 38.83% return, which is significantly higher than BLPIX's 10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed BLPIX with an annualized return of 37.46%, while BLPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.96% annualized return.

RMQHX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 19.81%
• YTD: 38.83%
• 6M: 35.00%
• 1Y: 84.57%
• 3Y*: 50.69%
• 5Y*: 26.53%
• 10Y*: 37.46%

BLPIX

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 5.08%
• YTD: 10.74%
• 6M: 10.97%
• 1Y: 27.28%
• 3Y*: 19.46%
• 5Y*: 11.01%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H	38.83%	33.90%	44.74%	115.89%	-59.96%	56.33%	101.06%	80.70%	-7.28%	69.79%
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund	10.74%	15.01%	20.24%	24.13%	-19.81%	23.73%	16.04%	28.97%	-6.09%	19.51%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQHX and BLPIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015	0.90

The correlation between RMQHX and BLPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RMQHX vs. BLPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQHX

RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 68
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

BLPIX

BLPIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
BLPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
BLPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
BLPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
BLPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
BLPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMQHX	BLPIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.73	2.35	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.21	-0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.43	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	3.02	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.59	13.89	-1.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is comparable to the BLPIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQHX and BLPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMQHX	BLPIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.73	2.35	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.65	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.73	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.75	0.36	+0.39

Drawdowns

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than BLPIX's maximum drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and BLPIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMQHX	BLPIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.21%	-57.98%	-5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.97%	-9.21%	-15.76%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.46%	-18.98%	-23.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.21%	-26.11%	-37.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.21%	-33.93%	-29.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.87%	-13.87%	+1.00%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.89%	2.00%	+4.89%

Volatility

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 8.62% compared to ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) at 2.83%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMQHX	BLPIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.62%	2.83%	+5.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.34%	9.00%	+15.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.21%	11.88%	+20.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.22%	16.94%	+29.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.44%	17.74%	+28.70%

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than BLPIX's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Dividend Comparison

RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.05%, more than BLPIX's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund	1.43%	1.58%	0.00%	0.03%	0.98%	6.68%	5.79%	1.64%	0.62%
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H	25.05%	34.77%	25.22%	3.66%	0.00%	2.13%	5.17%	0.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMQHX and BLPIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, RMQHX and BLPIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, RMQHX or BLPIX?

RMQHX has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to BLPIX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQHX dropped -63.21% vs BLPIX's -57.98%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.