RMQHX vs. BLPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. BLPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Nov 30, 1997.
Performance
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -19.03% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund | -7.48% | 15.01% | 20.24% | 24.13% | -19.81% | 23.73% | 16.04% | 28.97% | -6.09% | 19.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -19.03% return, which is significantly lower than BLPIX's -7.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed BLPIX with an annualized return of 30.11%, while BLPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.09% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 6M
- -16.54%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 30.11%
BLPIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -7.48%
- 6M
- -5.44%
- 1Y
- 11.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.32%
- 10Y*
- 11.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than BLPIX's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. BLPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
BLPIX
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 0.69 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.08 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.83 | +0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.35 | 3.84 | -0.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 0.69 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.49 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 0.63 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.33 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and BLPIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 42.94%, more than BLPIX's 1.71% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 42.94% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% |
BLPIX ProFunds Bull Investor Fund | 1.71% | 1.58% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.98% | 6.68% | 5.79% | 1.64% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than BLPIX's maximum drawdown of -57.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and BLPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -57.98% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -12.15% | -12.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -26.11% | -37.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -33.93% | -29.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.97% | -9.21% | -15.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -13.95% | +0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.21% | 2.63% | +4.58% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. BLPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 11.12% compared to ProFunds Bull Investor Fund (BLPIX) at 4.24%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | BLPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.12% | 4.24% | +6.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.22% | 9.08% | +16.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.33% | 18.09% | +29.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.20% | 16.90% | +29.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.31% | 17.70% | +28.61% |