PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ULPIX vs. RYNVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ULPIX achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than RYNVX's 15.77% return. Over the past 10 years, ULPIX has outperformed RYNVX with an annualized return of 22.92%, while RYNVX has yielded a comparatively lower 19.09% annualized return.


ULPIX

1D
0.49%
1M
10.10%
YTD
20.47%
6M
20.77%
1Y
55.55%
3Y*
35.78%
5Y*
18.71%
10Y*
22.92%

RYNVX

1D
0.38%
1M
7.70%
YTD
15.77%
6M
15.91%
1Y
41.27%
3Y*
29.44%
5Y*
16.36%
10Y*
19.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
20.47%25.47%38.03%45.59%-39.16%59.28%19.12%62.17%-15.02%42.77%
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
15.77%21.42%33.14%35.31%-29.96%42.56%19.64%45.58%-10.24%31.17%

Correlation

The correlation between ULPIX and RYNVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1998

0.99

The correlation between ULPIX and RYNVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ULPIX vs. RYNVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ULPIX
ULPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
ULPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ULPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

RYNVX
RYNVX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
RYNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RYNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) and Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ULPIXRYNVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

2.38

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.03

3.11

-0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.41

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

3.04

+0.06

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.66

13.67

-0.01

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ULPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the RYNVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ULPIX and RYNVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ULPIXRYNVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.38

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.63

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.70

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.41

-0.16

Drawdowns

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ULPIX drawdown since its inception was -89.68%, which is greater than RYNVX's maximum drawdown of -76.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ULPIX and RYNVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ULPIXRYNVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.68%

-76.54%

-13.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.30%

-13.84%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.59%

-27.49%

-9.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.92%

-40.92%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.41%

-48.58%

-10.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.84%

-19.63%

-14.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

3.08%

+1.08%

Volatility

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraBull Fund (ULPIX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Rydex Nova Fund (RYNVX) at 4.26%. This indicates that ULPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RYNVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ULPIXRYNVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.61%

4.26%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

13.48%

+4.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.74%

17.82%

+5.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.91%

25.95%

+7.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.45%

27.39%

+8.06%

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ULPIX has a 1.46% expense ratio, which is higher than RYNVX's 1.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

ULPIX vs. RYNVX - Dividend Comparison

ULPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than RYNVX's 0.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RYNVX
Rydex Nova Fund
0.65%0.76%0.66%0.59%22.11%9.07%0.53%0.00%0.00%1.97%1.22%0.13%
ULPIX
ProFunds UltraBull Fund
7.56%9.11%0.00%0.02%10.36%5.62%12.74%0.42%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, ULPIX and RYNVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ULPIX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to RYNVX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ULPIX dropped -89.68% vs RYNVX's -76.54%.

ULPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ULPIX and RYNVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer