RMFGX vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ).
RMFGX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Feb 21, 1950. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999.
Performance
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6 | -1.26% | 16.43% | 15.28% | 9.78% | -4.19% | 25.28% | 5.15% | 21.92% | -2.00% | 17.86% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | -4.76% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMFGX achieves a -1.26% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's -4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RMFGX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.95%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.99% annualized return.
RMFGX
- 1D
- 1.86%
- 1M
- -6.03%
- YTD
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 12.01%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.93%
- 10Y*
- 10.95%
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -3.79%
- YTD
- -4.76%
- 6M
- -2.89%
- 1Y
- 24.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.83%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 18.99%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMFGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
RMFGX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
RMFGX
QQQ
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMFGX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.07 | -0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.66 | -0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.28 | 2.00 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | 7.32 | -1.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMFGX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.07 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.59 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | 0.86 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.38 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMFGX and QQQ is 0.77, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
RMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.99%, more than QQQ's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6 | 7.99% | 7.85% | 6.59% | 4.06% | 5.20% | 4.88% | 2.30% | 4.89% | 6.75% | 6.23% | 4.54% | 6.84% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.48% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Drawdowns
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMFGX and QQQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMFGX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | -82.97% | +53.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -12.62% | +2.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.17% | -35.12% | +19.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.79% | -35.12% | +5.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.18% | -7.86% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -32.99% | +30.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.37% | 3.44% | -1.07% |
Volatility
RMFGX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) is 4.04%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that RMFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMFGX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 6.61% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.56% | 12.82% | -5.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 22.70% | -8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.50% | 22.38% | -9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 22.25% | -8.14% |