RMFGX vs. APGZX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX).
RMFGX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Feb 21, 1950. APGZX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jul 1, 2015.
Performance
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6 | -3.06% | 16.43% | 15.28% | 9.78% | -4.19% | 25.28% | 5.15% | 21.92% | -2.00% | 17.86% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | -12.76% | 13.26% | 25.47% | 35.12% | -28.74% | 29.00% | 34.47% | 34.24% | 2.30% | 31.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMFGX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly higher than APGZX's -12.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RMFGX has underperformed APGZX with an annualized return of 10.75%, while APGZX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.52% annualized return.
RMFGX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
APGZX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -10.09%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -12.55%
- 1Y
- 7.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 8.77%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMFGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than APGZX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMFGX vs. APGZX — Risk / Return Rank
RMFGX
APGZX
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMFGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.40 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 0.73 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.10 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 0.34 | +0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 1.34 | +2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMFGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.40 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.44 | +0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.74 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.73 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMFGX and APGZX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Dividend Comparison
RMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, less than APGZX's 11.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6 | 8.14% | 7.85% | 6.59% | 4.06% | 5.20% | 4.88% | 2.30% | 4.89% | 6.75% | 6.23% | 4.54% | 6.84% |
APGZX AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z | 11.19% | 9.77% | 6.62% | 1.69% | 0.87% | 7.19% | 2.60% | 3.49% | 9.11% | 3.78% | 2.72% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum APGZX drawdown of -33.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMFGX and APGZX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMFGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | -33.87% | +4.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -15.21% | +4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.17% | -33.87% | +18.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.79% | -33.87% | +4.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -15.21% | +7.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -6.08% | +3.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 3.90% | -1.56% |
Volatility
RMFGX vs. APGZX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) is 3.36%, while AB Large Cap Growth Fund Class Z (APGZX) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that RMFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APGZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMFGX | APGZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 5.13% | -1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 10.81% | -3.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 19.91% | -6.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 20.12% | -7.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 19.60% | -5.50% |