RMFGX vs. FXAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX).
RMFGX is an actively managed fund by American Funds. It was launched on Feb 21, 1950. FXAIX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Feb 17, 1988.
Performance
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6 | -3.06% | 16.43% | 15.28% | 9.78% | -4.19% | 25.28% | 5.15% | 21.92% | -2.00% | 17.86% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | -7.05% | 17.84% | 25.01% | 26.29% | -18.14% | 28.71% | 18.42% | 31.48% | -4.43% | 21.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMFGX achieves a -3.06% return, which is significantly higher than FXAIX's -7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RMFGX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 10.75%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.75% annualized return.
RMFGX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -7.89%
- YTD
- -3.06%
- 6M
- -1.41%
- 1Y
- 10.11%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.75%
FXAIX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -7.05%
- 6M
- -4.59%
- 1Y
- 14.42%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.40%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMFGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
RMFGX vs. FXAIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMFGX
FXAIX
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMFGX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.05 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.19 | 5.13 | -0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMFGX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 0.68 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.75 | +0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMFGX and FXAIX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison
RMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.14%, more than FXAIX's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6 | 8.14% | 7.85% | 6.59% | 4.06% | 5.20% | 4.88% | 2.30% | 4.89% | 6.75% | 6.23% | 4.54% | 6.84% |
FXAIX Fidelity 500 Index Fund | 1.20% | 1.11% | 1.25% | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.22% | 1.60% | 2.06% | 2.72% | 1.97% | 2.52% | 2.83% |
Drawdowns
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMFGX and FXAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMFGX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.79% | -33.79% | +4.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.22% | -12.13% | +1.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.17% | -24.50% | +9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.79% | -33.79% | +4.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.89% | -8.89% | +1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -3.83% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.34% | 2.50% | -0.16% |
Volatility
RMFGX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) is 3.36%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that RMFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMFGX | FXAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.36% | 4.24% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.33% | 9.08% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.82% | 18.13% | -4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.48% | 16.88% | -4.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.10% | 18.03% | -3.93% |